mirror of
https://github.com/lux-apps/papers.git
synced 2026-10-30 18:15:21 +00:00
zeekayandHanzo Dev
178febad68
Every rendered "T-Chain" / "ThresholdVM" / "teleportvm" reference across the paper corpus is rewritten to the correct canonical chain by concern: threshold signing / MPC / bridge custody / key recovery -> M-Chain (MVM); FHE / encrypted compute / threshold decryption -> F-Chain (FVM); teleport / cross-chain messaging -> B-Chain (bridgevm); consensus Pulsar stays Q-Chain. Section lux-trust-kernel/03-t-chain-threshold-governance.tex renamed -> 03-f-chain-encrypted-policy.tex (with \input + xref fixes). Braided "T-Chain" sections split by concern (M vs F). Only lp-020's chain-separation rationale and the shared lux/chains/thresholdvm library path retain the name, to record the removal. All changed papers rebuilt (pdflatex, rc=0, no undefined refs). ยง09 of lux-dao-governance-framework reframed: fabricated "production deployment" metrics ($50M/$240k/$12M, survey %s, "as of Oct 2024") relabeled as illustrative design configurations with no invented replacements; reality noted (DAO treasury is a 1/1 Safe); conclusion echo + one "first production" overclaim softened. This commit also captures concurrent corpus workstreams on the same tree. Co-authored-by: Hanzo Dev <[email protected]>
79 lines
3.1 KiB
TeX
79 lines
3.1 KiB
TeX
\section{Conclusion}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quasar represents a fundamental advancement in blockchain consensus design, achieving quantum security without sacrificing performance. Through triple-proof finality combining classical BLS with post-quantum Corona signatures, Q-Chain provides:
|
|
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
\item \textbf{10\,ms GPU BLS finality} (100\,ms CPU fallback) with triple-proof quantum security
|
|
\item \textbf{$\sim$4.8\,M TPS execution-only upper bound} (opcode dispatch) at the 1\,B gas block limit---not an end-to-end finality figure; finality is bound by signature recovery, settlement conflict-detection, and BLS/PQ finality
|
|
\item \textbf{Quantum resistance} through defense-in-depth
|
|
\item \textbf{Modular architecture} supporting various blockchain types
|
|
\item \textbf{Physical impossibility} of real-time quantum attacks ($<$10\,ms window)
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
The narrow $<$10\,ms attack window with GPU BLS makes quantum attacks physically impossible, while the modular consensus stack (Photon, Wave, Nova, Nebula, Prism, Quasar) provides flexibility for different use cases. Q-Chain positions Lux Network at the forefront of blockchain security for the next generation of decentralized applications.
|
|
|
|
By combining sampling-based consensus, threshold cryptography, and post-quantum signatures, Quasar achieves the seemingly impossible: quantum security with classical-level performance.
|
|
|
|
\begin{thebibliography}{99}
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{shor1994}
|
|
Shor, P.W. (1994).
|
|
\textit{Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer}.
|
|
SIAM Journal on Computing, 26(5), 1484-1509.
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{nist-pqc}
|
|
NIST (2024).
|
|
\textit{Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization}.
|
|
National Institute of Standards and Technology.
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{mosca2018}
|
|
Mosca, M. (2018).
|
|
\textit{Cybersecurity in an Era with Quantum Computers}.
|
|
IEEE Security \& Privacy, 16(5), 38-41.
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{corona}
|
|
{Lux Industries} (2026).
|
|
\textit{Corona: Two-Round Module-LWE Threshold Signatures}.
|
|
\texttt{github.com/luxfi/corona}.
|
|
Lux's own Module-LWE (Ringtail-derived) two-round threshold scheme;
|
|
builds on the Ringtail line~\cite{ringtail}.
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{ringtail}
|
|
C.~Boschini, D.~Kaviani, R.~W.~F.~Lai, G.~Malavolta, A.~Takahashi, and
|
|
M.~Tibouchi (2024).
|
|
\textit{Ringtail: Practical Two-Round Threshold Signatures from LWE}.
|
|
Cryptology ePrint Archive, Paper 2024/1113; IEEE S\&P 2025.
|
|
Academic two-round lattice threshold (IACR ePrint 2024/1113).
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{boneh-bls}
|
|
Boneh, D., Lynn, B., \& Shacham, H. (2001).
|
|
\textit{Short Signatures from the Weil Pairing}.
|
|
Advances in Cryptology---ASIACRYPT 2001, 514-532.
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{verkle-trees}
|
|
Kuszmaul, J. (2019).
|
|
\textit{Verkle Trees}.
|
|
Ethereum Research.
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{avalanche-consensus}
|
|
Team Rocket (2020).
|
|
\textit{Scalable and Probabilistic Leaderless BFT Consensus through Metastability}.
|
|
arXiv:1906.08936.
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{sui-consensus}
|
|
Blackshear, S. et al. (2022).
|
|
\textit{Narwhal and Tusk: A DAG-based Mempool and Efficient BFT Consensus}.
|
|
EuroSys 2022.
|
|
|
|
\bibitem{lux-benchmarks}
|
|
Lux Industries (2026).
|
|
\textit{Quasar Consensus --- Measured Benchmarks}.
|
|
Apple M1 Max, darwin/arm64, Go 1.26.1.
|
|
\url{https://github.com/luxfi/consensus/blob/main/BENCHMARKS.md}.
|
|
|
|
\end{thebibliography}
|
|
|
|
\appendix
|
|
|