Files
zeekay f4ee7a0525 Publish under the org, not a person
Bylines, paper authorship, correspondence addresses and the founder blurb under
each post named an individual. They name the organisation that published the
work instead: the brand on posts and pages, the research byline on papers, and
research@ in place of a personal address. Both are what these repositories
already used elsewhere — nothing new was coined.

Co-authors are untouched. Where a paper named someone else alongside, they stay
named; only the one byline changed. Bibliography entries, running heads,
PDF metadata and affiliations move with it, so a citation still resolves to
whoever the cited paper names.

Sample and fixture data uses the placeholder name these tests already use
elsewhere, so no assertion changed meaning.
2026-09-01 08:58:10 -07:00

80 lines
4.0 KiB
TeX

\documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage{../shared/luxcover}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts,amsthm}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{algorithm}
\usepackage{algpseudocode}
\usepackage{listings}
\usepackage{xcolor}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usepackage{float}
\usepackage{enumitem}
\usepackage{array}
\usepackage{multirow}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\input{../shared/lstlang}
\usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta,positioning,shapes.geometric,fit,calc}
\hypersetup{colorlinks=true,linkcolor=black,citecolor=blue,urlcolor=blue}
\lstset{
basicstyle=\ttfamily\scriptsize,
breaklines=true,
frame=single,
numbers=left,
numberstyle=\tiny\color{gray},
keywordstyle=\color{blue!70!black}\bfseries,
commentstyle=\color{green!50!black}\itshape,
stringstyle=\color{red!60!black},
showstringspaces=false,
}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{definition}{Definition}
\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
\newtheorem{remark}{Remark}
\title{Quasar Horizon: Hybrid Post-Quantum Finality\\over DAG-Native Nebula Roots}
\author{
Lux Research\thanks{Corresponding author: [email protected]}\\
\textit{Lux Industries, Inc.}\\
\texttt{[email protected]}
}
\date{2026-03-03 \quad\textit{Subtitle: A consensus paper composing Pulsar (LP-073), Lens (LP-103), LSS (LP-077), Beam (LP-075), and ML-DSA (LP-070) under Prism (LP-105) over a Nebula DAG substrate (LP-020).}}
\begin{document}
\luxcoverpage
\begin{abstract}
\noindent We present Lux, a hybrid post-quantum consensus architecture for DAG-native chains. Lux separates fast operational finality from durable post-quantum finality. Validators emit Photons over a Nebula DAG substrate; classical BLS aggregates form Beams for low-latency confirmation, while ML-DSA attestations and Pulsar lattice-threshold Pulses provide post-quantum finality over Nebula roots. Prism binds all certificate lanes to the same transcript, and Quasar reaches Horizon finality when the bound lanes verify.
\textbf{This paper.} Quasar Horizon is the consensus-level composition theorem of the Lux stack. We show how four independent threshold artifacts --- a BLS Beam (LP-075 \cite{lp075}), a per-validator ML-DSA cert set (LP-070 \cite{lp070}), a Pulsar Pulse (LP-073 \cite{lp073}), and an optional Lens classical-threshold control-plane certificate (LP-103 \cite{lp103}) --- compose into a single Prism-bound (LP-105 \cite{lp105}) finality artifact through transcript binding rather than aggregation. We do not rederive the underlying threshold mathematics; the cryptographic kernels are specified in the LP-073 Pulsar paper \cite{lp073} and the LSS lifecycle paper \cite{luxlssmpc,lp077}. We do specify (i) the formal model in which Horizon makes sense over a DAG substrate, (ii) the Prism verification predicate, (iii) the asynchronous PQ-finality discipline that lets Pulse follow Beam without blocking the hot path, (iv) the L1/L2/L3 tier model under co-validation, (v) grouped Pulsar deployment for large validator sets, and (vi) the exact code path that makes the 258-test \texttt{protocol/quasar} suite witness the composition. Soundness is by reference to four canonical proof-bucket theorems\footnote{\texttt{proofs/quasar/horizon-soundness.tex} (Theorem~\ref{thm:horizon-soundness}), \texttt{proofs/quasar/l1-l2-covalidation.tex} (Theorem~\ref{thm:l2-covalidation}), \texttt{proofs/pulsar/unforgeability.tex} (Theorem~\ref{thm:pulsar-suf-cma}), \texttt{proofs/quasar-cert-soundness.tex} (Thm.~7.5--7.7).} which carry the per-lane reductions and the composition argument.
\end{abstract}
\tableofcontents
\newpage
\input{sections/01-introduction}
\input{sections/02-formal-model}
\input{sections/03-prism-composition}
\input{sections/04-horizon-soundness}
\input{sections/05-asynchronous-pq-finality}
\input{sections/06-l1-l2-l3-tier-model}
\input{sections/07-grouped-pulsar}
\input{sections/08-implementation}
\input{sections/09-related-work}
\input{sections/10-future-work}
\bibliographystyle{plain}
\bibliography{references}
\end{document}