mirror of
https://github.com/lux-apps/papers.git
synced 2026-10-30 18:15:21 +00:00
zeekay
f4ee7a0525
Bylines, paper authorship, correspondence addresses and the founder blurb under each post named an individual. They name the organisation that published the work instead: the brand on posts and pages, the research byline on papers, and research@ in place of a personal address. Both are what these repositories already used elsewhere — nothing new was coined. Co-authors are untouched. Where a paper named someone else alongside, they stay named; only the one byline changed. Bibliography entries, running heads, PDF metadata and affiliations move with it, so a citation still resolves to whoever the cited paper names. Sample and fixture data uses the placeholder name these tests already use elsewhere, so no assertion changed meaning.
66 lines
2.8 KiB
TeX
66 lines
2.8 KiB
TeX
\documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}
|
|
\usepackage{../shared/luxcover}
|
|
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
|
|
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
|
|
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts,amsthm}
|
|
\usepackage{graphicx}
|
|
\usepackage{hyperref}
|
|
\usepackage{algorithm}
|
|
\usepackage{algpseudocode}
|
|
\usepackage{booktabs}
|
|
\usepackage{multirow}
|
|
\usepackage{array}
|
|
\usepackage{xcolor}
|
|
\usepackage{pgfplots}
|
|
\usepackage{float}
|
|
\usepackage{enumitem}
|
|
\usepackage{mathtools}
|
|
\pgfplotsset{compat=1.18}
|
|
|
|
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}
|
|
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
|
|
\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
|
|
\newtheorem{definition}{Definition}
|
|
\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
|
|
\newtheorem{remark}{Remark}
|
|
|
|
\hypersetup{
|
|
colorlinks=true,
|
|
linkcolor=blue,
|
|
citecolor=blue,
|
|
urlcolor=blue
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
\title{\textbf{Lux Tokenomics: Economic Design for Multi-Chain Consensus Networks}\\[6pt]
|
|
\large Token Distribution, Staking Economics, Fee Burning, and\\Inflation--Deflation Mechanics for Sustainable Network Growth}
|
|
|
|
\author{
|
|
Lux Research\thanks{Corresponding author: [email protected]}\\
|
|
\textit{Lux Industries Inc}\\
|
|
\texttt{[email protected]}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
\date{2023}
|
|
|
|
\begin{document}
|
|
|
|
\luxcoverpage
|
|
|
|
\begin{abstract}
|
|
We present the complete tokenomic framework for Lux Network, a multi-consensus blockchain platform supporting heterogeneous appchains with independent virtual machines. The Lux token (LUX) serves simultaneously as the staking asset for Proof-of-Stake consensus, the gas token for transaction fees on the primary network, and the economic coordination mechanism across sovereign appchains. This paper formalizes the token supply schedule, derives optimal staking reward functions under rational validator assumptions, introduces an adaptive fee-burning mechanism that targets long-run deflation proportional to network utilization, and analyzes the game-theoretic equilibrium of validator participation. We prove that the proposed reward function satisfies incentive compatibility under a Byzantine adversary controlling up to one-third of stake, and we show via simulation that the fee-burning mechanism converges to a stable equilibrium supply within 200 epochs under realistic transaction volume growth. Finally, we compare the Lux tokenomic model against Ethereum EIP-1559, Cosmos ATOM inflation, and Polkadot DOT mechanics, demonstrating superior capital efficiency and lower variance in validator returns.
|
|
\end{abstract}
|
|
|
|
\input{sections/01-introduction}
|
|
\input{sections/02-token-supply-model}
|
|
\input{sections/03-staking-reward-mechanism}
|
|
\input{sections/04-adaptive-fee-burning-protocol}
|
|
\input{sections/05-game-theoretic-analysis}
|
|
\input{sections/06-appchain-economic-coupling}
|
|
\input{sections/07-simulation-results}
|
|
\input{sections/08-comparison-with-existing-systems}
|
|
\input{sections/09-inflation-schedule-details}
|
|
\input{sections/10-related-work}
|
|
\input{sections/99-conclusion}
|
|
|
|
\end{document}
|