zeekay ee35904c6c papers: add named-competitor comparison-table scaffolds + repro spec to 5 benchmark papers ...

Add explicit, literature-backed comparison scaffolds to:
- lux-pq-consensus-benchmarks (sec 09): vs Mysticeti-C, HotStuff/-2, Tendermint, Snowman
- lux-quasar-benchmarks (sec 15): vs Mysticeti-C, HotStuff-2, CometBFT, Snowman, TowerBFT
- lux-fhe-benchmarks (sec 12): vs TFHE-rs, Concrete, OpenFHE, Microsoft SEAL
- lux-zap-benchmarks (sec 14): vs Protobuf, FlatBuffers, Cap'n Proto, gRPC, QUIC, JSON-RPC
- evmgpu-benchmark (sec 13): vs geth, reth, erigon, evmone, Block-STM, pevm

Lux/competitor columns explicitly marked [TBD-measure] where not yet
benchmarked against the competitor's own published harness. Every
competitor cell is sourced to a cited paper, repo benchmark, or
vendor doc. Each scaffold ends with a Reproducibility spec
(hardware, software pins, commands, decision rule) for the actual
controlled run.

No invented Lux numbers; existing internal numbers retained but
flagged as not-yet-apples-to-apples vs literature.

2026-05-13 01:09:15 -07:00

257 KiB

Raw Permalink History

View Raw