mirror of
https://github.com/lux-apps/papers.git
synced 2026-10-30 18:15:21 +00:00
zeekayandHanzo Dev
2ae0219c29
MOR at $1.58, $14.3M cap, about $1.3M of DEX depth and $57K of daily volume, from CoinGecko and GeckoTerminal. Figures derived from them move with them: a $100K sell is now about two days of volume rather than eleven, and the emission worked example uses today's ~12,050 MOR/day. The protocol-owned share is stated as most of the depth; the exact share was an August read. Co-authored-by: Hanzo Dev <[email protected]>
83 lines
4.6 KiB
TeX
83 lines
4.6 KiB
TeX
\documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}
|
|
\usepackage{../shared/luxcover} % black cover (self-contained TikZ logo, no assets)
|
|
\usepackage{../shared/proposal} % \proposalhead helpers and the stake environment
|
|
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
|
|
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
|
|
\usepackage{listings}\usepackage{xcolor}
|
|
\input{../shared/lstlang}
|
|
|
|
\newcommand{\code}[1]{\texttt{\small #1}}
|
|
\setlength{\emergencystretch}{3em}
|
|
|
|
\title{Yield That Scales With Volume}
|
|
\author{Zach Kelling\\\textit{Lux Industries, Inc.}\\\texttt{[email protected]}}
|
|
\date{2026}
|
|
|
|
\begin{document}
|
|
\luxcoverpage
|
|
\sloppy
|
|
|
|
\proposalhead{Yield That Scales With Volume}{%
|
|
Emission outruns real revenue about ten to one. The buyback that answers it runs on deposit
|
|
yield, which falls when the token does. Fuel it with a fee on verified inference volume, and
|
|
the buyback grows with usage instead of deposits.}{ADOPT-08}
|
|
|
|
\noindent\textbf{The problem, in Morpheus numbers.}
|
|
MOR trades at \$1.58, a market cap near \$14M [verified]. The buyback is real and well built:
|
|
75\% of captured yield buys MOR for burn, a sixteen-year lock, and the liquidity Safe, about
|
|
\$511K over the trailing year [verified]. The fuel is the problem. It is Lido and Aave yield on
|
|
third-party deposits, about \$476K/yr and falling: \$3.24M per quarter at the 2024 launch, a
|
|
fraction of that now [verified]. Emission runs \$5--6M/yr against it, about ten to one
|
|
[verified]. The fuel is tied to the wrong variable. A weaker token lowers deposit incentive,
|
|
lowers yield, shrinks the buyback. Fuel and token fall together.
|
|
|
|
\noindent\textbf{The fix, named to a repo.}
|
|
Change what the buyback runs on. Add a fee on verified inference volume and route it into the
|
|
same three sinks. Settlement today is \code{pricePerSecond} times elapsed seconds on a
|
|
provider-signed receipt (\code{SessionRouter.sol:264}) [verified]. The receipt signs
|
|
\code{inputTokens} and \code{outputTokens} (\code{abi.go:18-19}), but the contract decodes five
|
|
of seven fields and ignores both (\code{SessionRouter.sol:237}) [verified]. A fee on that
|
|
settlement is a fee on the clock, and the clock is fakeable. \code{mord} makes settlement
|
|
un-fakeable: faked work earns zero, model substitution is slashed (built, 40 tests pass
|
|
[verified]). \code{lux/ai} supplies attestation, quorum, and \code{SlashProvider} on local
|
|
nvtrust/SPDM/RIM, no cloud [verified]. Sessions already settle in MOR, so the fee is the
|
|
buyback asset with no conversion. It is a governed parameter, zero by default.
|
|
|
|
\noindent\textbf{The outcome, with its assumptions.}
|
|
Take $\tau = 1\%$ of settled revenue, linear [illustrative]. At $\tau = 1\%$, \$51M/yr of
|
|
verified inference reproduces the \$511K the buyback draws today; matching the \$5--6M/yr of
|
|
emission needs about \$500M/yr [illustrative]. Volume closes the ten-to-one gap because the fee
|
|
scales with usage, not with deposits or price. Published Morpheus demand is about zero: no
|
|
usage, session, or revenue figure appears in 62 repositories [verified]. Our funnel projects
|
|
100,000,000+ launch reach [client] to about 2M monthly active, about 40k into a private
|
|
inference tier, about 20k routed, and 1,000 to 10,000 verified sessions per day near-term,
|
|
supply-bounded at the 18 providers now live [illustrative]. The low case, 10k sessions per day,
|
|
already exceeds all current published Morpheus demand [verified].
|
|
|
|
\begin{stake}{What Morpheus gets}
|
|
\item A buyback fuelled by inference served rather than deposits held, and external revenue in
|
|
MOR, the one thing the review found no durable source of.
|
|
\item One facet on the diamond, one governed parameter, reversible and inert until set.
|
|
\end{stake}
|
|
|
|
\begin{stake}{What we bring}
|
|
\item The verified base the fee reads: \code{mord} settlement, \code{lux/ai} attestation and
|
|
slashing. The demand: hanzo.chat, hanzo/dev, lux.exchange, lux/wallet [client].
|
|
\item Governance and rails behind it: \code{lux/dao} plus Safe and timelock, \code{lux/dex},
|
|
\code{lux/liquid}, a KYC base onboarded through Hanzo IAM.
|
|
\end{stake}
|
|
|
|
\noindent\textbf{Relevance.}
|
|
The fee needs verified volume and real demand in the same hand. Verification without demand
|
|
prices nothing; demand without verification fees fake receipts. We hold both, and no other
|
|
counterparty does. Demand and verifiability land first, token rails second, an L2 and a raise
|
|
third, into demonstrated on-chain revenue rather than a promise of it.
|
|
|
|
\vspace{0.5ex}
|
|
\noindent{\color{muted}\footnotesize\sffamily
|
|
ADOPT-08, full paper available. On-chain and repo figures verified; funnel and take-rate
|
|
illustrative under stated assumptions; reach is our launch surface.
|
|
\quad\textbullet\quad \texttt{[email protected]}}
|
|
|
|
\end{document}
|