Files
Daniel DimitrovandGitHub 975b535177 refactor(web): migrate bridge feature to standard architecture (#6969)
Refactors the bridge feature to comply with the feature architecture standard established in #6936.

Changes:
- Add public API barrel (index.ts) with lazy-loaded Bridge component
- Extract constants (BRIDGE_WIDGET_URL, LOCAL_STORAGE_CONSENT_KEY) to constants.ts
- Create barrel files for hooks and components
- Remove redundant inner dynamic() import in Bridge component
- Update external imports to use public API

Benefits:
- Proper code splitting at feature boundary
- Consistent structure with other features
- Simplified lazy loading (single boundary instead of nested)
- Improved maintainability

Resolves: https://linear.app/safe-global/issue/WA-1259/refactor-bridge-feature-to-new-feature-architecture
2026-01-22 17:02:48 +01:00

1.6 KiB

Specification Quality Checklist: Bridge Feature Refactor

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-01-15
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • The spec references specific file paths (index.ts, types.ts, etc.) which are necessary for a refactoring task but don't constitute implementation details—they describe the required structure, not how to implement it
  • Success criteria SC-004 mentions "chunk file" which is a build output, not an implementation detail—it's a measurable outcome
  • The spec correctly preserves the existing geoblocking integration as a requirement rather than changing it
  • All requirements are derived from the established standard in 001-feature-architecture, ensuring consistency across feature migrations