Daniel DimitrovandGitHub
c06e9fc63f
* docs(earn): add specification and planning documents for counterfactor refactor * refactor(web): migrate counterfactual feature to new standard feature architecture - Reorganize 10 components into subdirectories with barrel files - Create public API with types, constants, and feature flag hook - Update 47 external import sites to use @/features/counterfactual - Rename utils.ts to safeDeployment.ts for better clarity - Split shared CSS into component-specific modules - Colocate tests with source code - Enable code splitting through barrel exports Zero behavioral changes - all tests pass, type-check clean. * fix(web): circular imports counterfactual
2.3 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Counterfactual Feature Refactor
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-01-15
Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
All checklist items pass. The specification is complete and ready for planning or implementation via /speckit.clarify or /speckit.plan.
Validation Details
Content Quality: The spec focuses on structural refactoring outcomes (directories, imports, feature flags) without prescribing specific implementation. While it references TypeScript, React, and Next.js, these are the established technologies in the codebase per 001-feature-architecture, not new decisions being made.
Requirement Completeness: All 32 functional requirements are concrete and testable. Success criteria are measurable (zero ESLint warnings, 100% test pass rate, zero bytes loaded when disabled, etc.).
Feature Readiness: The 5 user stories progress logically from structure (P1) to public API (P2) to feature flag (P3) to lazy loading (P4) to validation (P5). Each story is independently testable and provides incremental value.
Edge Cases: Six edge cases are identified covering external imports, circular dependencies, loading states, disabled state behavior, type exports, and test file relocation.
Assumptions: Eight assumptions document dependencies on existing infrastructure (feature flag enum, useHasFeature hook, Redux configuration, etc.) that the refactoring relies on but does not change.