torus-ml/tests/torch/test_compile_torch.py

"""Tests for the torch to numpy module."""

# pylint: disable=too-many-lines
import tempfile
from functools import partial
from inspect import signature
from pathlib import Path

import numpy
import onnx
import pytest
import torch
import torch.quantization
from torus.fhe import ParameterSelectionStrategy  # pylint: disable=ungrouped-imports
from torch import nn

from torus.ml.common.utils import (
    array_allclose_and_same_shape,
    manage_parameters_for_pbs_errors,
    to_tuple,
)
from torus.ml.onnx.convert import OPSET_VERSION_FOR_ONNX_EXPORT
from torus.ml.pytest.torch_models import (
    FC,
    AddNet,
    AllZeroCNN,
    BranchingGemmModule,
    BranchingModule,
    CNNGrouped,
    CNNOther,
    ConcatFancyIndexing,
    Conv1dModel,
    DoubleQuantQATMixNet,
    EmbeddingModel,
    EncryptedMatrixMultiplicationModel,
    ExpandModel,
    FCSmall,
    IdentityExpandModel,
    IdentityExpandMultiOutputModel,
    MultiInputNN,
    MultiInputNNConfigurable,
    MultiInputNNDifferentSize,
    MultiOutputModel,
    NetWithLoops,
    PaddingNet,
    ShapeOperationsNet,
    SimpleNet,
    SingleMixNet,
    StepActivationModule,
    StepFunctionPTQ,
    TinyQATCNN,
    TorchDivide,
    TorchMultiply,
    UnivariateModule,
    WhereNet,
)
from torus.ml.quantization import QuantizedModule

# pylint sees separated imports from torus but does not understand they come from two different
# packages/projects, disable the warning
# pylint: disable=ungrouped-imports
from torus.ml.torch.compile import (
    _compile_torch_or_onnx_model,
    build_quantized_module,
    compile_brevitas_qat_model,
    compile_onnx_model,
    compile_torch_model,
)

# pylint: enable=ungrouped-imports


def create_test_inputset(inputset, n_percent_inputset_examples_test):
    """Create a test input-set from a given input-set and percentage of examples."""
    n_examples_test = int(n_percent_inputset_examples_test * to_tuple(inputset)[0].shape[0])
    x_test = tuple(inputs[:n_examples_test] for inputs in to_tuple(inputset))
    return x_test


def get_and_compile_quantized_module(
    model, inputset, import_qat, n_bits, n_rounding_bits, configuration, verbose, device
):
    """Get and compile the quantized module built from the given model."""
    quantized_numpy_module = build_quantized_module(
        model,
        inputset,
        import_qat=import_qat,
        n_bits=n_bits,
        rounding_threshold_bits=n_rounding_bits,
    )

    p_error, global_p_error = manage_parameters_for_pbs_errors(None, None)

    quantized_numpy_module.compile(
        inputset,
        configuration=configuration,
        p_error=p_error,
        global_p_error=global_p_error,
        verbose=verbose,
        device=device,
    )

    return quantized_numpy_module


# pylint: disable-next=too-many-arguments, too-many-branches
def compile_and_test_torch_or_onnx(  # pylint: disable=too-many-locals, too-many-statements
    input_output_feature,
    model_class,
    activation_function,
    qat_bits,
    default_configuration,
    simulate,
    is_onnx,
    check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit,
    dump_onnx=False,
    expected_onnx_str=None,
    verbose=False,
    get_and_compile=False,
    input_shape=None,
    is_brevitas_qat=False,
    device="cpu",
) -> QuantizedModule:
    """Test the different model architecture from torch numpy."""

    # Define an input shape (n_examples, n_features)
    n_examples = 500

    # Define the torch model
    torch_model = model_class(
        input_output=input_output_feature, activation_function=activation_function
    )

    num_inputs = len(signature(torch_model.forward).parameters)

    # If no specific input shape is given, use the number of input/output features
    if input_shape is None:
        input_shape = input_output_feature

    # Create random input
    if num_inputs > 1:
        inputset = tuple(
            numpy.random.uniform(-100, 100, size=(n_examples, *to_tuple(input_shape[i])))
            for i in range(num_inputs)
        )
    else:
        inputset = (numpy.random.uniform(-100, 100, size=(n_examples, *to_tuple(input_shape))),)

    # Compile our network with the same bitwidth in simulation and FHE
    if qat_bits == 0:
        n_bits_w_a = 4
    else:
        n_bits_w_a = qat_bits

    n_bits = (
        {
            "model_inputs": n_bits_w_a,
            "model_outputs": n_bits_w_a,
            "op_inputs": n_bits_w_a,
            "op_weights": n_bits_w_a,
        }
        if qat_bits == 0
        else qat_bits
    )

    n_rounding_bits = 6

    # FHE vs Quantized are not done in the test anymore (see issue #177)
    if not simulate:
        if is_onnx:
            output_onnx_file_path = Path(tempfile.mkstemp(suffix=".onnx")[1])

            dummy_input = tuple(torch.from_numpy(val[[0], ::]).float() for val in inputset)
            torch.onnx.export(
                torch_model,
                dummy_input,
                str(output_onnx_file_path),
                opset_version=OPSET_VERSION_FOR_ONNX_EXPORT,
            )
            onnx_model = onnx.load_model(str(output_onnx_file_path))
            onnx.checker.check_model(onnx_model)

            if get_and_compile:
                quantized_numpy_module = get_and_compile_quantized_module(
                    model=onnx_model,
                    inputset=inputset,
                    import_qat=qat_bits != 0,
                    n_bits=n_bits,
                    n_rounding_bits=n_rounding_bits,
                    configuration=default_configuration,
                    verbose=verbose,
                    device=device,
                )

            else:
                quantized_numpy_module = compile_onnx_model(
                    onnx_model,
                    inputset,
                    import_qat=qat_bits != 0,
                    configuration=default_configuration,
                    n_bits=n_bits,
                    rounding_threshold_bits=n_rounding_bits,
                    verbose=verbose,
                    device=device,
                )
        else:
            if is_brevitas_qat:
                n_bits = qat_bits

                quantized_numpy_module = compile_brevitas_qat_model(
                    torch_model=torch_model,
                    torch_inputset=inputset,
                    n_bits=n_bits,
                    rounding_threshold_bits=n_rounding_bits,
                    configuration=default_configuration,
                    verbose=verbose,
                    device=device,
                )

            elif get_and_compile:
                quantized_numpy_module = get_and_compile_quantized_module(
                    model=torch_model,
                    inputset=inputset,
                    import_qat=qat_bits != 0,
                    n_bits=n_bits,
                    n_rounding_bits=n_rounding_bits,
                    configuration=default_configuration,
                    verbose=verbose,
                    device=device,
                )

            else:
                quantized_numpy_module = compile_torch_model(
                    torch_model,
                    inputset,
                    import_qat=qat_bits != 0,
                    configuration=default_configuration,
                    n_bits=n_bits,
                    rounding_threshold_bits=n_rounding_bits,
                    verbose=verbose,
                    device=device,
                )

        n_examples_test = 1
        # Use some input-set to test the inference.
        # Using the input-set allows to remove any chance of overflow.
        x_test = tuple(inputs[:n_examples_test] for inputs in inputset)

        quantized_numpy_module.check_model_is_compiled()

        # Make sure FHE simulation and quantized module forward give the same output.
        check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit(
            x_test, model=quantized_numpy_module, simulate=simulate
        )
    else:
        if is_brevitas_qat:
            n_bits = qat_bits

            quantized_numpy_module = compile_brevitas_qat_model(
                torch_model=torch_model,
                torch_inputset=inputset,
                n_bits=n_bits,
                rounding_threshold_bits=n_rounding_bits,
                configuration=default_configuration,
                verbose=verbose,
            )

        else:
            if get_and_compile:
                quantized_numpy_module = get_and_compile_quantized_module(
                    model=torch_model,
                    inputset=inputset,
                    import_qat=qat_bits != 0,
                    n_bits=n_bits,
                    n_rounding_bits=n_rounding_bits,
                    configuration=default_configuration,
                    verbose=verbose,
                    device="cpu",
                )

            else:
                quantized_numpy_module = compile_torch_model(
                    torch_model,
                    inputset,
                    import_qat=qat_bits != 0,
                    configuration=default_configuration,
                    n_bits=n_bits,
                    rounding_threshold_bits=n_rounding_bits,
                    verbose=verbose,
                    device="cpu",
                )

        accuracy_test_rounding(
            torch_model,
            quantized_numpy_module,
            inputset,
            import_qat=qat_bits != 0,
            configuration=default_configuration,
            n_bits=n_bits,
            simulate=simulate,
            verbose=verbose,
            check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit=check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit,
            is_brevitas_qat=is_brevitas_qat,
        )

        if dump_onnx:
            str_model = onnx.helper.printable_graph(quantized_numpy_module.onnx_model.graph)
            print("ONNX model:")
            print(str_model)
            assert str_model == expected_onnx_str

    return quantized_numpy_module


# pylint: disable-next=too-many-arguments,too-many-locals
def accuracy_test_rounding(
    torch_model,
    quantized_numpy_module,
    inputset,
    import_qat,
    configuration,
    n_bits,
    simulate,
    verbose,
    check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit,
    is_brevitas_qat=False,
):
    """Check rounding behavior with both EXACT and APPROXIMATE methods.

    The original quantized_numpy_module, compiled over the torch_model without rounding is
    compared against quantized_numpy_module_round_low_precision and
    quantized_numpy_module_round_high_precision, the torch_model compiled with a rounding threshold
    of 2 bits and 8 bits respectively, using both EXACT and APPROXIMATE methods.

    The final assertion tests whether the mean absolute error between
    quantized_numpy_module_round_high_precision and quantized_numpy_module is lower than
    quantized_numpy_module_round_low_precision and quantized_numpy_module making sure that the
    rounding feature has the expected behavior on the model accuracy.
    """

    # Check that the maximum_integer_bit_width is at least 4 bits to compare the rounding
    # feature with enough precision.
    assert quantized_numpy_module.fhe_circuit.graph.maximum_integer_bit_width() >= 4

    # Define rounding thresholds for high and low precision with both EXACT and APPROXIMATE methods
    rounding_thresholds = {
        "high_exact": {"method": "EXACT", "n_bits": 8},
        "low_exact": {"method": "EXACT", "n_bits": 2},
        "high_approximate": {"method": "APPROXIMATE", "n_bits": 8},
        "low_approximate": {"method": "APPROXIMATE", "n_bits": 2},
    }

    compiled_modules = {}

    # Compile models with different rounding thresholds and methods
    for key, rounding_threshold in rounding_thresholds.items():
        if is_brevitas_qat:
            compiled_modules[key] = compile_brevitas_qat_model(
                torch_model,
                inputset,
                n_bits=n_bits,
                configuration=configuration,
                rounding_threshold_bits=rounding_threshold,
                verbose=verbose,
            )
        else:
            compiled_modules[key] = compile_torch_model(
                torch_model,
                inputset,
                import_qat=import_qat,
                configuration=configuration,
                n_bits=n_bits,
                rounding_threshold_bits=rounding_threshold,
                verbose=verbose,
            )

    n_percent_inputset_examples_test = 0.1
    # Using the input-set allows to remove any chance of overflow.
    x_test = create_test_inputset(inputset, n_percent_inputset_examples_test)

    # Make sure the modules have the same quantization result
    qtest = to_tuple(quantized_numpy_module.quantize_input(*x_test))
    for _, module in compiled_modules.items():
        qtest_rounded = to_tuple(module.quantize_input(*x_test))
        assert all(
            numpy.array_equal(qtest_i, qtest_rounded_i)
            for (qtest_i, qtest_rounded_i) in zip(qtest, qtest_rounded)
        )
    results: dict = {key: [] for key in compiled_modules}
    for i in range(x_test[0].shape[0]):
        q_x = tuple(q[[i]] for q in to_tuple(qtest))
        for key, module in compiled_modules.items():
            q_result = module.quantized_forward(*q_x, fhe="simulate")
            result = module.dequantize_output(q_result)
            results[key].append(result)

    # Check modules predictions FHE simulation vs Torus ML.
    for key, module in compiled_modules.items():

        # low bit-width rounding is not behaving as expected with new simulation
        # FIXME: https://github.com/luxfi/torus-ml-internal/issues/4331
        if "low" not in key:
            check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit(x_test, module, simulate=simulate)

    # FIXME: The following MSE comparison is commented out due to instability issues.
    # We will investigate a better way to assess the rounding feature's performance.
    # https://github.com/luxfi/torus-ml-internal/issues/3662
    # mse_results = {
    #     key: numpy.mean(numpy.square(numpy.subtract(results['original'], result_list)))
    #     for key, result_list in results.items()
    # }
    # assert (mse_results['high_exact'] <= mse_results['low_exact'],
    #   "Rounding is not working as expected.")
    # assert (mse_results['high_approximate'] <= mse_results['low_approximate'],
    #   "Rounding is not working as expected.")


# This test is a known flaky
# FIXME: https://github.com/luxfi/torus-ml-internal/issues/3429
@pytest.mark.flaky
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "activation_function",
    [
        pytest.param(nn.ReLU, id="relu"),
    ],
)
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "model, input_output_feature",
    [
        pytest.param(FCSmall, 5),
        pytest.param(partial(NetWithLoops, n_fc_layers=2), 5),
        pytest.param(BranchingModule, 5),
        pytest.param(BranchingGemmModule, 5),
        pytest.param(MultiInputNN, [5, 5]),
        pytest.param(MultiInputNNDifferentSize, [5, 10]),
        pytest.param(UnivariateModule, 5),
        pytest.param(StepActivationModule, 5),
        pytest.param(EncryptedMatrixMultiplicationModel, 5),
        pytest.param(TorchDivide, [1, 1]),
        pytest.param(TorchMultiply, [1, 1]),
    ],
)
@pytest.mark.parametrize("simulate", [True, False], ids=["FHE_simulation", "FHE"])
@pytest.mark.parametrize("is_onnx", [True, False], ids=["is_onnx", ""])
@pytest.mark.parametrize("get_and_compile", [True, False], ids=["get_and_compile", "compile"])
def test_compile_torch_or_onnx_networks(
    input_output_feature,
    model,
    activation_function,
    default_configuration,
    simulate,
    is_onnx,
    get_and_compile,
    check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit,
    is_weekly_option,
    get_device,
):
    """Test the different model architecture from torch numpy."""

    # Avoid too many tests
    if not simulate and not is_weekly_option:
        if model not in [FCSmall, BranchingModule]:
            pytest.skip("Avoid too many tests")

    # The QAT bits is set to 0 in order to signal that the network is not using QAT
    qat_bits = 0

    compile_and_test_torch_or_onnx(
        input_output_feature=input_output_feature,
        model_class=model,
        activation_function=activation_function,
        qat_bits=qat_bits,
        default_configuration=default_configuration,
        simulate=simulate,
        is_onnx=is_onnx,
        check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit=check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit,
        verbose=False,
        get_and_compile=get_and_compile,
        device=get_device,
    )


# This test is a known flaky
# FIXME: https://github.com/luxfi/torus-ml-internal/issues/3660
@pytest.mark.flaky
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "activation_function",
    [
        pytest.param(nn.ReLU, id="relu"),
    ],
)
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "model, is_1d",
    [
        pytest.param(CNNOther, False, id="CNN"),
        pytest.param(partial(CNNGrouped, groups=3), False, id="CNN_grouped"),
        pytest.param(Conv1dModel, True, id="CNN_conv1d"),
    ],
)
@pytest.mark.parametrize("simulate", [True, False])
@pytest.mark.parametrize("is_onnx", [True, False])
def test_compile_torch_or_onnx_conv_networks(  # pylint: disable=unused-argument
    model,
    is_1d,
    activation_function,
    default_configuration,
    simulate,
    is_onnx,
    check_graph_input_has_no_tlu,
    check_graph_output_has_no_tlu,
    check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit,
    request,
):
    """Test the different model architecture from torch numpy."""

    if "True-CNN-relu" in request.node.callspec.id:
        pytest.skip("Incorrectly simulated CNN test skipped.")

    # The QAT bits is set to 0 in order to signal that the network is not using QAT
    qat_bits = 0

    input_shape = (6, 7) if is_1d else (6, 7, 7)
    input_output = input_shape[0]

    q_module = compile_and_test_torch_or_onnx(
        input_output_feature=input_output,
        model_class=model,
        activation_function=activation_function,
        qat_bits=qat_bits,
        default_configuration=default_configuration,
        simulate=simulate,
        is_onnx=is_onnx,
        check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit=check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit,
        verbose=False,
        input_shape=input_shape,
    )

    check_graph_input_has_no_tlu(q_module.fhe_circuit.graph)
    check_graph_output_has_no_tlu(q_module.fhe_circuit.graph)


@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "activation_function",
    [
        pytest.param(nn.Sigmoid, id="sigmoid"),
        pytest.param(nn.ReLU, id="relu"),
        pytest.param(nn.ReLU6, id="relu6"),
        pytest.param(nn.Tanh, id="tanh"),
        pytest.param(nn.ELU, id="ELU"),
        pytest.param(nn.Hardsigmoid, id="Hardsigmoid"),
        pytest.param(nn.Hardtanh, id="Hardtanh"),
        pytest.param(nn.LeakyReLU, id="LeakyReLU"),
        pytest.param(nn.SELU, id="SELU"),
        pytest.param(nn.CELU, id="CELU"),
        pytest.param(nn.Softplus, id="Softplus"),
        pytest.param(nn.PReLU, id="PReLU"),
        pytest.param(nn.Hardswish, id="Hardswish"),
        pytest.param(nn.SiLU, id="SiLU"),
        pytest.param(nn.Mish, id="Mish"),
        pytest.param(nn.Tanhshrink, id="Tanhshrink"),
        pytest.param(partial(nn.Threshold, threshold=0, value=0), id="Threshold"),
        pytest.param(nn.Softshrink, id="Softshrink"),
        pytest.param(nn.Softsign, id="Softsign"),
        pytest.param(nn.GELU, id="GELU"),
        pytest.param(nn.LogSigmoid, id="LogSigmoid"),
        # Some issues are still encountered with some activations
        # FIXME: https://github.com/luxfi/torus-ml-internal/issues/335
        #
        # Other problems, certainly related to tests:
        # Required positional arguments: 'embed_dim' and 'num_heads' and fails with a partial
        # pytest.param(nn.MultiheadAttention, id="MultiheadAttention"),
        # Activation with a RandomUniformLike
        # pytest.param(nn.RReLU, id="RReLU"),
        # Halving dimension must be even, but dimension 3 is size 3
        # pytest.param(nn.GLU, id="GLU"),
    ],
)
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "model, input_output_feature",
    [
        pytest.param(FCSmall, 5),
    ],
)
@pytest.mark.parametrize("simulate", [True, False])
@pytest.mark.parametrize("is_onnx", [True, False])
def test_compile_torch_or_onnx_activations(
    input_output_feature,
    model,
    activation_function,
    default_configuration,
    simulate,
    is_onnx,
    check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit,
):
    """Test the different model architecture from torch numpy."""

    # The QAT bits is set to 0 in order to signal that the network is not using QAT
    qat_bits = 0

    compile_and_test_torch_or_onnx(
        input_output_feature,
        model,
        activation_function,
        qat_bits,
        default_configuration,
        simulate,
        is_onnx,
        check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit,
        verbose=False,
    )


@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "model",
    [
        pytest.param(StepFunctionPTQ),
    ],
)
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "input_output_feature",
    [pytest.param(input_output_feature) for input_output_feature in [2, 4]],
)
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "n_bits",
    [pytest.param(n_bits) for n_bits in [1, 2]],
)
@pytest.mark.parametrize("simulate", [True, False])
def test_compile_torch_qat(
    input_output_feature,
    model,
    n_bits,
    default_configuration,
    simulate,
    check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit,
):
    """Test the different model architecture from torch numpy."""

    model = partial(model, n_bits=n_bits)

    # Import these networks from torch directly
    is_onnx = False
    qat_bits = 0

    compile_and_test_torch_or_onnx(
        input_output_feature,
        model,
        nn.Sigmoid,
        qat_bits,
        default_configuration,
        simulate,
        is_onnx,
        check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit,
        verbose=False,
    )


@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "model_class, input_output_feature, is_brevitas_qat",
    [pytest.param(partial(MultiInputNNDifferentSize, is_brevitas_qat=True), [5, 10], True)],
)
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "n_bits",
    [pytest.param(n_bits) for n_bits in [2]],
)
@pytest.mark.parametrize("simulate", [True, False])
def test_compile_brevitas_qat(
    model_class,
    input_output_feature,
    is_brevitas_qat,
    n_bits,
    simulate,
    default_configuration,
    check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit,
):
    """Test compile_brevitas_qat_model."""

    model_class = partial(model_class, n_bits=n_bits)

    # If this is a Brevitas QAT model, use n_bits for QAT bits
    if is_brevitas_qat:
        qat_bits = n_bits

    # The QAT bits is set to 0 in order to signal that the network is not using QAT
    else:
        qat_bits = 0

    compile_and_test_torch_or_onnx(
        input_output_feature=input_output_feature,
        model_class=model_class,
        activation_function=None,
        qat_bits=qat_bits,
        default_configuration=default_configuration,
        simulate=simulate,
        is_onnx=False,
        check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit=check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit,
        verbose=False,
        is_brevitas_qat=is_brevitas_qat,
    )


# Update this test to align with Torus's simulation fix.
# FIXME: https://github.com/luxfi/torus-ml-internal/issues/4578
@pytest.mark.xfail
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "model_class, expected_onnx_str",
    [
        pytest.param(
            FC,
            (
                """graph main_graph (
  %x[FLOAT, 1x7]
) initializers (
  %fc1.weight[FLOAT, 128x7]
  %fc1.bias[FLOAT, 128]
  %fc2.weight[FLOAT, 64x128]
  %fc2.bias[FLOAT, 64]
  %fc3.weight[FLOAT, 64x64]
  %fc3.bias[FLOAT, 64]
  %fc4.weight[FLOAT, 64x64]
  %fc4.bias[FLOAT, 64]
  %fc5.weight[FLOAT, 10x64]
  %fc5.bias[FLOAT, 10]
) {
  %/fc1/Gemm_output_0 = Gemm[alpha = 1, beta = 1, transB = 1]"""
                """(%x, %fc1.weight, %fc1.bias)
  %/act_1/Relu_output_0 = Relu(%/fc1/Gemm_output_0)
  %/fc2/Gemm_output_0 = Gemm[alpha = 1, beta = 1, transB = 1]"""
                """(%/act_1/Relu_output_0, %fc2.weight, %fc2.bias)
  %/act_2/Relu_output_0 = Relu(%/fc2/Gemm_output_0)
  %/fc3/Gemm_output_0 = Gemm[alpha = 1, beta = 1, transB = 1]"""
                """(%/act_2/Relu_output_0, %fc3.weight, %fc3.bias)
  %/act_3/Relu_output_0 = Relu(%/fc3/Gemm_output_0)
  %/fc4/Gemm_output_0 = Gemm[alpha = 1, beta = 1, transB = 1]"""
                """(%/act_3/Relu_output_0, %fc4.weight, %fc4.bias)
  %/act_4/Relu_output_0 = Relu(%/fc4/Gemm_output_0)
  %19 = Gemm[alpha = 1, beta = 1, transB = 1](%/act_4/Relu_output_0, %fc5.weight, %fc5.bias)
  return %19
}"""
            ),
        ),
    ],
)
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "activation_function",
    [
        pytest.param(nn.ReLU, id="relu"),
    ],
)
def test_dump_torch_network(
    model_class,
    expected_onnx_str,
    activation_function,
    default_configuration,
    check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit,
):
    """This is a test which is equivalent to tests in test_dump_onnx.py, but for torch modules."""
    input_output_feature = 7
    simulate = True
    is_onnx = False
    qat_bits = 0

    compile_and_test_torch_or_onnx(
        input_output_feature,
        model_class,
        activation_function,
        qat_bits,
        default_configuration,
        simulate,
        is_onnx,
        check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit,
        dump_onnx=True,
        expected_onnx_str=expected_onnx_str,
        verbose=False,
    )


def test_compile_where_net(default_configuration, check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit):
    """Test compilation and execution of PTQSimpleNet."""
    n_feat = 32
    n_examples = 100

    torch_model = WhereNet(n_feat)

    # Create random input
    inputset = numpy.random.uniform(-100, 100, size=(n_examples, n_feat))

    # Compile the model
    quantized_module = compile_torch_model(
        torch_model,
        inputset,
        n_bits=16,
        configuration=default_configuration,
    )

    # Test execution
    x_test = inputset[:10]  # Use first 10 samples for testing

    # Check if FHE simulation and quantized module forward give the same output
    check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit(x_test, model=quantized_module, simulate=True)

    # Compare with PyTorch model
    torch_output = torch_model(torch.from_numpy(x_test).float()).detach().numpy()
    quantized_output = quantized_module.forward(x_test, fhe="disable")

    numpy.testing.assert_allclose(torch_output, quantized_output, rtol=1e-2, atol=1e-2)


def test_qat_import_bits_check(default_configuration):
    """Test that compile_brevitas_qat_model does not need an n_bits config."""

    input_features = 10

    model = SingleMixNet(False, True, 10, 2)

    n_examples = 50

    # All these n_bits configurations should be valid
    # and produce the same result, as the input/output bit-widths for this network
    # are ignored due to the input/output TLU elimination
    n_bits_valid = [
        4,
        2,
        {"model_inputs": 4, "model_outputs": 4},
        {"model_inputs": 2, "model_outputs": 2},
    ]

    # Create random input
    inputset = numpy.random.uniform(-100, 100, size=(n_examples, input_features))

    # Compile with no quantization bit-width, defaults are used
    quantized_numpy_module = compile_brevitas_qat_model(
        model,
        inputset,
        configuration=default_configuration,
    )

    n_percent_inputset_examples_test = 0.1
    # Using the input-set allows to remove any chance of overflow.
    x_test = create_test_inputset(inputset, n_percent_inputset_examples_test)

    # The result of compiling without any n_bits (default)
    predictions = quantized_numpy_module.forward(*x_test, fhe="disable")

    # Compare the results of running with n_bits=None to the results running with
    # all the other n_bits configs. The results should be the same as bit-widths
    # are ignored for this network (they are overridden with Brevitas values stored in ONNX).
    for n_bits in n_bits_valid:
        quantized_numpy_module = compile_brevitas_qat_model(
            model,
            inputset,
            n_bits=n_bits,
            configuration=default_configuration,
        )

        new_predictions = quantized_numpy_module.forward(*x_test, fhe="disable")

        assert numpy.all(predictions == new_predictions)

    n_bits_invalid = [
        {"XYZ": 8, "model_inputs": 8},
        {"XYZ": 8},
    ]

    # Test that giving a dictionary with invalid keys does not work
    for n_bits in n_bits_invalid:
        with pytest.raises(
            AssertionError, match=".*n_bits should only contain the following keys.*"
        ):
            quantized_numpy_module = compile_brevitas_qat_model(
                model,
                inputset,
                n_bits=n_bits,
                configuration=default_configuration,
            )


@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "model, input_shape, input_output",
    [
        # This model is trying to import a network that is QAT (has a quantizer in the graph)
        # but the import bit-width is wrong (mismatch between bit-width specified in training
        # and the bit-width specified during import). For NNs that are not built with Brevitas
        # the bit-width must be manually specified and is used to infer quantization parameters.
        (partial(StepFunctionPTQ, n_bits=6, disable_bit_check=True), None, 10),
        # This network may look like QAT but it just zeros all inputs
        (AllZeroCNN, (1, 7, 7), 1),
        # This second case is a network that is not QAT but is being imported as a QAT network
        (CNNOther, (1, 7, 7), 1),
    ],
)
def test_qat_import_check(
    model,
    input_shape,
    input_output,
    default_configuration,
    check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit,
):
    """Test two cases of custom (non brevitas) NNs where importing as QAT networks should fail."""

    with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Error occurred during quantization aware training.*"):
        compile_and_test_torch_or_onnx(
            input_output_feature=input_output,
            model_class=model,
            activation_function=nn.ReLU,
            qat_bits=4,
            default_configuration=default_configuration,
            simulate=True,
            is_onnx=False,
            check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit=check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit,
            # For non-null input_shape values, input_output is input_shape[0]
            input_shape=input_shape,
        )


@pytest.mark.parametrize("n_bits", [2])
@pytest.mark.parametrize("use_qat", [True, False])
@pytest.mark.parametrize("force_tlu", [True, False])
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "module, input_shape, num_inputs, is_fully_leveled",
    [
        (SingleMixNet, (1, 8, 8), 1, True),
        (SingleMixNet, 10, 1, True),
        (MultiInputNNConfigurable, 10, 2, False),
        (MultiInputNNConfigurable, (1, 8, 8), 2, False),
        (DoubleQuantQATMixNet, (1, 8, 8), 1, False),
        (DoubleQuantQATMixNet, 10, 1, False),
        (AddNet, 10, 2, False),
    ],
)
def test_net_has_no_tlu(
    module,
    input_shape,
    num_inputs,
    is_fully_leveled,
    use_qat,
    force_tlu,
    n_bits,
    default_configuration,
    check_graph_output_has_no_tlu,
):
    """Tests that there is no TLU in nets with a single conv/linear."""

    # Skip the test if the model is MultiInputNNConfigurable and use_qat is True as the module is
    # not QAT (it has no Brevitas layer)
    if num_inputs > 1 and use_qat:
        return

    use_conv = isinstance(input_shape, tuple) and len(input_shape) > 1

    net = module(use_conv, use_qat, input_shape, n_bits)
    net.eval()

    if not is_fully_leveled:
        # No need to force the presence of a TLU if there are TLUs in the body of the
        # network
        force_tlu = False

    if module is DoubleQuantQATMixNet:
        use_qat = True

    # We have the option to force having a TLU in the net by
    # applying a nonlinear function on the original network's output. Thus
    # we can check that a tlu is indeed present and was not removed by accident in this case
    if force_tlu:

        def relu_adder_decorator(method):
            def decorate_name(self):
                return torch.relu(method(self))

            return decorate_name

        net.forward = relu_adder_decorator(net.forward)

    # Generate the input in both the 2d and 1d cases
    input_shape = to_tuple(input_shape)

    # Create random input
    inputset = tuple(
        numpy.random.uniform(-100, 100, size=(100, *input_shape)) for _ in range(num_inputs)
    )

    if use_qat:
        # Compile with appropriate QAT compilation function, here the zero-points will all be 0
        quantized_numpy_module = compile_brevitas_qat_model(
            net,
            inputset,
            configuration=default_configuration,
        )
    else:
        # Compile with PTQ. Note that this will have zero-point>0
        quantized_numpy_module = compile_torch_model(
            net,
            inputset,
            import_qat=False,
            configuration=default_configuration,
            n_bits=n_bits,
        )

    assert quantized_numpy_module.fhe_circuit is not None
    mlir = quantized_numpy_module.fhe_circuit.mlir

    # Check if a TLU is present or not, depending on whether we force a TLU to be present
    if force_tlu:
        with pytest.raises(AssertionError):
            check_graph_output_has_no_tlu(quantized_numpy_module.fhe_circuit.graph)
        if is_fully_leveled:
            with pytest.raises(AssertionError):
                assert "lookup_table" not in mlir
    else:
        check_graph_output_has_no_tlu(quantized_numpy_module.fhe_circuit.graph)
        if is_fully_leveled:
            assert "lookup_table" not in mlir


@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "model_class", [pytest.param(ShapeOperationsNet), pytest.param(ExpandModel)]
)
@pytest.mark.parametrize("simulate", [True, False])
@pytest.mark.parametrize("is_qat", [True, False])
@pytest.mark.parametrize("n_channels", [2])
def test_shape_operations_net(
    model_class,
    simulate,
    n_channels,
    is_qat,
    default_configuration,
    check_graph_output_has_no_tlu,
    check_float_array_equal,
):
    """Test a pattern of reshaping, concatenation, chunk extraction."""
    model = model_class(is_qat)

    # Shape transformation do not support >1 example in the inputset
    # FIXME: https://github.com/luxfi/torus-ml-internal/issues/3871
    inputset = numpy.random.uniform(size=(1, n_channels, 2, 2))

    if is_qat:
        quantized_module = compile_brevitas_qat_model(
            model,
            inputset,
            configuration=default_configuration,
            p_error=0.01,
        )
    else:
        quantized_module = compile_torch_model(
            model,
            inputset,
            configuration=default_configuration,
            n_bits=3,
            p_error=0.01,
        )

    # In QAT quantization options are consistent across all the layers
    # which allows for the elimination of TLUs
    # In PTQ there are TLUs in the graph because Shape/Concat/Transpose
    # must quantize inputs with some default quantization options

    # In QAT testing in FHE is fast since there are no TLUs
    # For PTQ we only test that the model can be compiled and that it can be executed
    if is_qat or simulate:
        fhe_mode = "simulate" if simulate else "execute"

        predictions = quantized_module.forward(inputset, fhe=fhe_mode)

        torch_output = model(torch.tensor(inputset)).detach().numpy()

        assert predictions.shape == torch_output.shape, "Output shape must be the same."

        # In PTQ the results do not match because of a-priori set quantization options
        # Currently no solution for concat/reshape/transpose correctness in PTQ is proposed.
        if is_qat:
            check_float_array_equal(torch_output, predictions, atol=0.05, rtol=0)

            # In QAT, since the quantization is defined a-priori, all TLUs will be removed
            # and the input quantizer is moved to the clear. We can thus check there are no TLUs
            # in the graph
            check_graph_output_has_no_tlu(quantized_module.fhe_circuit.graph)
            assert "lookup_table" not in quantized_module.fhe_circuit.mlir


def test_torch_padding(default_configuration, check_circuit_has_no_tlu):
    """Test padding in PyTorch using ONNX pad operators."""
    net = PaddingNet()

    num_batch = 20
    inputset = numpy.random.uniform(size=(num_batch, 1, 2, 2))

    quant_model = compile_brevitas_qat_model(
        net,
        inputset,
        configuration=default_configuration,
        p_error=0.01,
    )

    test_input = numpy.ones((1, 1, 2, 2))

    torch_output = net(torch.tensor(test_input)).detach().numpy()

    cml_output = quant_model.forward(test_input, fhe="disable")

    # We only care about checking that zeros added with padding are in the same positions
    # between the torch output and the Torus ML output
    torch_output = torch_output > 0
    cml_output = cml_output > 0

    assert numpy.all(torch_output == cml_output)
    check_circuit_has_no_tlu(quant_model.fhe_circuit)


def test_compilation_functions_check_model_types(default_configuration):
    """Check that the compile functions validate the input model types."""

    input_output_feature = 5
    n_examples = 50

    torch_model = FCSmall(input_output_feature, nn.ReLU)

    # Create random input
    inputset = numpy.random.uniform(-100, 100, size=(n_examples, input_output_feature))

    with pytest.raises(
        AssertionError,
        match=".*no Brevitas quantized layers, consider using compile_torch_model instead.*",
    ):
        compile_brevitas_qat_model(
            torch_model,
            inputset,
            configuration=default_configuration,
        )

    torch_model_qat = TinyQATCNN(5, 4, 10, True, False, False)
    with pytest.raises(
        AssertionError, match=".*must be imported using compile_brevitas_qat_model.*"
    ):
        compile_torch_model(
            torch_model_qat,
            inputset,
            configuration=default_configuration,
        )


@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "model_object",
    [
        pytest.param(ConcatFancyIndexing),
    ],
)
def test_fancy_indexing_torch(model_object, default_configuration):
    """Test fancy indexing torch."""
    model = model_object(10, 10, 2, 4, 3)
    x = numpy.random.randint(0, 2, size=(100, 3, 10)).astype(numpy.float64)
    compile_brevitas_qat_model(model, x, n_bits=4, configuration=default_configuration)


@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "model_object",
    [
        pytest.param(MultiOutputModel),
    ],
)
def test_multi_output(model_object, default_configuration):
    """Test torch compilation with multi-output models."""
    # Create model and random dataset
    model = model_object()
    x = numpy.random.randint(0, 2, size=(100, 3, 10)).astype(numpy.float64)
    y = numpy.random.randint(0, 2, size=(100, 3, 10)).astype(numpy.float64)

    # Pytorch baseline
    torch_result = model(x[[0]], y[[0]])

    # Compile with low bit width
    quantized_module = compile_torch_model(
        model, (x, y), n_bits=4, configuration=default_configuration
    )
    qm_result = quantized_module.forward(x[[0]], y[[0]])
    simulation_result = quantized_module.forward(x[[0]], y[[0]], fhe="simulate")

    # Assert that we have the expected number of outputs
    assert isinstance(qm_result, tuple) and len(qm_result) == 2
    assert isinstance(simulation_result, tuple) and len(simulation_result) == 2
    assert isinstance(torch_result, tuple) and len(torch_result) == 2

    # Assert that we are exact between simulation and clear quantized
    for qm_res, sim_res in zip(qm_result, simulation_result):
        assert isinstance(qm_res, numpy.ndarray)
        assert isinstance(sim_res, numpy.ndarray)
        assert array_allclose_and_same_shape(qm_res, sim_res, atol=1e-30)

    # Assert that we aren't too far away from torch with low bit width
    for qm_res, trch_res in zip(qm_result, torch_result):
        assert isinstance(qm_res, numpy.ndarray)
        assert isinstance(trch_res, numpy.ndarray)

        # Very high tolerance because we use low bit width
        assert array_allclose_and_same_shape(qm_res, trch_res, atol=1e-1)

    # Create quantized module with high bit width
    quantized_module = build_quantized_module(
        model,
        (x, y),
        n_bits=24,
    )
    qm_result = quantized_module.forward(x[[0]], y[[0]])

    # Assert that we the correct number of outputs again
    assert isinstance(qm_result, tuple) and len(qm_result) == 2

    # Assert that we have the same results as torch with high bit width quantization
    for qm_res, trch_res in zip(qm_result, torch_result):
        assert isinstance(qm_res, numpy.ndarray)
        assert isinstance(trch_res, numpy.ndarray)

        # Very low tolerance because we use high bit width
        assert array_allclose_and_same_shape(qm_res, trch_res, atol=1e-10)


@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "model, input_output_feature",
    [
        pytest.param(FCSmall, 5),
    ],
)
@pytest.mark.parametrize("is_onnx", [True, False], ids=["is_onnx", ""])
def test_mono_parameter_rounding_warning(
    input_output_feature,
    model,
    default_configuration,
    is_onnx,
    check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit,
):
    """Test that setting mono-parameter strategy along rounding properly raises a warning."""

    # The QAT bits is set to 0 in order to signal that the network is not using QAT
    qat_bits = 0

    # Set the parameter strategy to mono-parameter
    default_configuration.parameter_selection_strategy = ParameterSelectionStrategy.MONO

    with pytest.warns(
        UserWarning,
        match=".* set the optimization strategy to multi-parameter when using rounding.*",
    ):
        compile_and_test_torch_or_onnx(
            input_output_feature=input_output_feature,
            model_class=model,
            activation_function=nn.ReLU,
            qat_bits=qat_bits,
            default_configuration=default_configuration,
            simulate=True,
            is_onnx=is_onnx,
            check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit=check_is_good_execution_for_cml_vs_circuit,
            verbose=False,
            get_and_compile=False,
        )


@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "cast_type, should_fail, error_message",
    [
        (torch.bool, False, None),
        (torch.float32, False, None),
        (torch.float64, False, None),
        (torch.int64, True, r"Invalid 'to' data type: INT64"),
    ],
)
def test_compile_torch_model_with_cast(cast_type, should_fail, error_message):
    """Test compiling a Torch model with various casts, expecting failure for invalid types."""
    torch_input = torch.randn(100, 28)

    class CastNet(nn.Module):
        """Network with cast."""

        def __init__(self, cast_to):
            super().__init__()
            self.threshold = torch.tensor(0.5, dtype=torch.float32)
            self.cast_to = cast_to

        def forward(self, x):
            """Forward pass with dynamic cast."""
            zeros = torch.zeros_like(x)
            x = x + zeros
            x = (x > self.threshold).to(self.cast_to)
            return x

    model = CastNet(cast_type)

    if should_fail:
        with pytest.raises(AssertionError, match=error_message):
            compile_torch_model(model, torch_input, cast_type, rounding_threshold_bits=3)
    else:
        compile_torch_model(model, torch_input, cast_type, rounding_threshold_bits=3)


def test_onnx_no_input():
    """Test a torch model that has no input when converted to onnx."""

    torch_input = torch.randn(100, 28)

    class NoInputNet(nn.Module):
        """Network with no input in the onnx graph."""

        def __init__(self):
            super().__init__()
            self.threshold = torch.tensor(0.5, dtype=torch.float32)

        def forward(self, x):
            """Forward pass."""
            zeros = numpy.zeros_like(x)
            x = x + zeros
            x = (x > self.threshold).to(torch.float32)
            return x

    model = NoInputNet()

    with pytest.raises(
        AssertionError, match="Input 'x' is missing in the ONNX graph after export."
    ):
        compile_torch_model(model, torch_input, rounding_threshold_bits=3)


@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "rounding_threshold_bits, expected_exception, match_message",
    [
        ({"n_bits": "auto"}, NotImplementedError, "Automatic rounding is not implemented yet."),
        (
            "invalid_type",
            ValueError,
            "Invalid type for rounding_threshold_bits. Must be int or dict.",
        ),
        (
            {"n_bits": 4, "method": "INVALID_METHOD"},
            ValueError,
            "INVALID_METHOD is not a valid method. Must be one of EXACT, APPROXIMATE.",
        ),
        (
            {"n_bits": 1},
            ValueError,
            "n_bits_rounding must be between 2 and 8 inclusive",
        ),
        (
            {"n_bits": 9},
            ValueError,
            "n_bits_rounding must be between 2 and 8 inclusive",
        ),
        (
            {"invalid_key": 4},
            KeyError,
            "Invalid keys in rounding_threshold_bits. Allowed keys are \\['method', 'n_bits'\\].",
        ),
        (
            {"n_bits": "not_an_int"},
            ValueError,
            "n_bits must be an integer.",
        ),
    ],
)
def test_compile_torch_model_rounding_threshold_bits_errors(
    rounding_threshold_bits, expected_exception, match_message, default_configuration
):
    """Test that compile_torch_model raises errors for invalid rounding_threshold_bits."""
    model = FCSmall(input_output=5, activation_function=nn.ReLU)
    torch_inputset = torch.randn(10, 5)

    with pytest.raises(expected_exception, match=match_message):
        compile_torch_model(
            torch_model=model,
            torch_inputset=torch_inputset,
            rounding_threshold_bits=rounding_threshold_bits,
            configuration=default_configuration,
        )


@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "rounding_method, expected_reinterpret",
    [
        ("APPROXIMATE", True),
        ("EXACT", False),
    ],
)
def test_rounding_mode(rounding_method, expected_reinterpret, default_configuration):
    """Test that the underlying FHE circuit uses the right rounding method."""
    model = FCSmall(input_output=5, activation_function=nn.ReLU)
    torch_inputset = torch.randn(10, 5)
    configuration = default_configuration

    compiled_module = compile_torch_model(
        torch_model=model,
        torch_inputset=torch_inputset,
        rounding_threshold_bits={"method": rounding_method, "n_bits": 4},
        configuration=configuration,
    )

    # Convert compiled module to string to search for patterns
    mlir = compiled_module.fhe_circuit.mlir
    if expected_reinterpret:
        assert (
            "reinterpret_precision" in mlir and "round" not in mlir
        ), "Expected 'reinterpret_precision' found but 'round' should not be present."
    else:
        assert "reinterpret_precision" not in mlir, "Unexpected 'reinterpret_precision' found."


def test_composition_compilation(default_configuration):
    """Test that we can compile models with composition."""
    default_configuration.composable = True
    torch_inputset = torch.randn(10, 5)

    model = SimpleNet()
    composition_mapping = {0: 0}

    # Check that we can compile a simple torch model with a proper composition mapping
    _compile_torch_or_onnx_model(
        model,
        torch_inputset,
        configuration=default_configuration,
        composition_mapping=composition_mapping,
    )

    torch_inputset_multi_input = (torch.randn(10, 5), torch.randn(10, 5))

    model = MultiOutputModel()
    composition_mapping = {1: 0}

    # Check that we can compile a multi-output torch model that does not consider all outputs for
    # composition
    _compile_torch_or_onnx_model(
        model,
        torch_inputset_multi_input,
        configuration=default_configuration,
        composition_mapping=composition_mapping,
    )

    model = MultiOutputModel()
    composition_mapping = {0: 1}

    # Check that we can compile a multi-input torch model that does not consider all inputs for
    # composition
    _compile_torch_or_onnx_model(
        model,
        torch_inputset_multi_input,
        configuration=default_configuration,
        composition_mapping=composition_mapping,
    )


def test_composition_errors(default_configuration):
    """Test that using composition in a wrong manner raises the proper errors."""
    torch_inputset = torch.randn(10, 5)

    check_composition_mapping_error_raise(default_configuration, torch_inputset)
    check_composition_shape_mismatch_error(default_configuration, torch_inputset)


def check_composition_mapping_error_raise(default_configuration, torch_inputset):
    """Check that using composition mappings in a wrong manner raises the proper errors."""
    model = FCSmall(input_output=5, activation_function=nn.ReLU)
    composition_mapping = {0: 2}

    with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Composition must be enabled in 'configuration'.*"):
        _compile_torch_or_onnx_model(
            model,
            torch_inputset,
            configuration=default_configuration,
            composition_mapping=composition_mapping,
        )

    default_configuration.composable = True

    # Disable mypy as this test is voluntarily made to fail
    composition_mapping = [(0, 0)]  # type: ignore[assignment]

    with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Parameter 'composition_mapping' mus be a dictionary.*"):
        _compile_torch_or_onnx_model(
            model,
            torch_inputset,
            configuration=default_configuration,
            composition_mapping=composition_mapping,
        )

    composition_mapping = {-1: 2}

    with pytest.raises(ValueError, match=r"Output positions \(keys\) must be positive integers.*"):
        _compile_torch_or_onnx_model(
            model,
            torch_inputset,
            configuration=default_configuration,
            composition_mapping=composition_mapping,
        )

    composition_mapping = {0: -2}

    with pytest.raises(ValueError, match=r"Input positions \(values\) must be positive integers.*"):
        _compile_torch_or_onnx_model(
            model,
            torch_inputset,
            configuration=default_configuration,
            composition_mapping=composition_mapping,
        )

    composition_mapping = {10: 2}

    with pytest.raises(ValueError, match=r"Output positions \(keys\) must not be greater.*"):
        _compile_torch_or_onnx_model(
            model,
            torch_inputset,
            configuration=default_configuration,
            composition_mapping=composition_mapping,
        )

    composition_mapping = {0: 20}

    with pytest.raises(ValueError, match=r"Input positions \(values\) must not be greater.*"):
        _compile_torch_or_onnx_model(
            model,
            torch_inputset,
            configuration=default_configuration,
            composition_mapping=composition_mapping,
        )


def check_composition_shape_mismatch_error(default_configuration, torch_inputset):
    """Check that composing a model with shape mismatches raises the proper errors.

    This could be done by either wrongly creating a torch model or by providing an unexpected
    composition mapping.
    """
    default_configuration.composable = True

    model = IdentityExpandModel()
    composition_mapping = {0: 0}
    with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="A shape mismatch has been found.*"):
        _compile_torch_or_onnx_model(
            model,
            torch_inputset,
            configuration=default_configuration,
            composition_mapping=composition_mapping,
        )

    model = IdentityExpandMultiOutputModel()
    composition_mapping = {1: 0}
    with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="A shape mismatch has been found.*"):
        _compile_torch_or_onnx_model(
            model,
            torch_inputset,
            configuration=default_configuration,
            composition_mapping=composition_mapping,
        )


def test_compile_embedding_model(default_configuration):
    """Test compiling the EmbeddingModel using compile_torch_model."""

    # Set up the EmbeddingModel parameters
    num_embeddings = 10
    embedding_dim = 5

    # Create the model
    model = EmbeddingModel(num_embeddings, embedding_dim)

    # Create integer input data
    n_samples = 100
    inputset = torch.randint(0, num_embeddings - 1, size=(n_samples, 1)).long()

    # Compile the model
    compiled_model = compile_torch_model(
        model,
        inputset,
        n_bits=8,
        configuration=default_configuration,
        rounding_threshold_bits=8,
        p_error=0.01,
    )

    # Test the compiled model
    test_input = torch.tensor([[3], [6], [1]]).long()
    torch_output = model(test_input).detach().numpy()
    test_input_numpy = test_input.numpy()
    compiled_output = compiled_model.forward(test_input_numpy)

    # Check if the outputs are close
    numpy.testing.assert_allclose(torch_output, compiled_output, atol=1e-1)

    # Test FHE simulation
    fhe_output = compiled_model.forward(test_input_numpy, fhe="simulate")

    numpy.testing.assert_allclose(torch_output, fhe_output, atol=1e-1)