mirror of
https://github.com/zoo-apps/papers.git
synced 2026-10-30 14:56:54 +00:00
Bylines, paper authorship, correspondence addresses and the founder blurb under each post named an individual. They name the organisation that published the work instead: the brand on posts and pages, the research byline on papers, and research@ in place of a personal address. Both are what these repositories already used elsewhere — nothing new was coined. Co-authors are untouched. Where a paper named someone else alongside, they stay named; only the one byline changed. Bibliography entries, running heads, PDF metadata and affiliations move with it, so a citation still resolves to whoever the cited paper names. Sample and fixture data uses the placeholder name these tests already use elsewhere, so no assertion changed meaning. Co-authored-by: Hanzo Dev <[email protected]>
82 lines
3.4 KiB
TeX
82 lines
3.4 KiB
TeX
\documentclass[11pt,letterpaper]{article}
|
|
\usepackage{shared/zoocover}
|
|
|
|
% Packages
|
|
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
|
|
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
|
|
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsthm}
|
|
\usepackage{algorithm}
|
|
\usepackage{algorithmic}
|
|
\usepackage{graphicx}
|
|
\usepackage{hyperref}
|
|
\usepackage{xcolor}
|
|
\usepackage{booktabs}
|
|
\usepackage{tikz}
|
|
\usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,calc}
|
|
\usepackage{listings}
|
|
\usepackage{caption}
|
|
\usepackage{subcaption}
|
|
% geometry loaded by zoocover
|
|
|
|
% Theorem environments
|
|
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
|
|
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
|
|
\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
|
|
\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
|
|
\newtheorem{definition}{Definition}[section]
|
|
\newtheorem{example}{Example}[section]
|
|
|
|
% Custom commands
|
|
\newcommand{\Zoo}{\textsc{Zoo}}
|
|
\newcommand{\Zen}{\textsc{Zen}}
|
|
\newcommand{\DSO}{\textsc{dso}}
|
|
\newcommand{\LLM}{\textsc{llm}}
|
|
\newcommand{\MTEB}{\textsc{mteb}}
|
|
\newcommand{\RAG}{\textsc{rag}}
|
|
|
|
% Hyperref setup
|
|
\hypersetup{
|
|
colorlinks=true,
|
|
linkcolor=blue,
|
|
citecolor=blue,
|
|
urlcolor=blue
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
% Title and authors
|
|
\title{\textbf{High-Dimensional Embedding Spaces for Semantic Search: The Case for 7680 Dimensions}\\
|
|
\large Zen Reranker and Native Embeddings for Decentralized AI}
|
|
|
|
\author{
|
|
Antje Worring, Zoo Labs Foundation Research\thanks{Corresponding author: [email protected]}\\
|
|
\textit{Hanzo Industries Inc (Techstars '17)}\\
|
|
\textit{Lux Industries Inc}\\
|
|
\textit{Zoo Labs Foundation}\\
|
|
\texttt{[email protected]}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
\date{January 2025}
|
|
|
|
\begin{document}
|
|
|
|
\zoocoverpage
|
|
|
|
\begin{abstract}
|
|
We present a systematic analysis of embedding dimensionality for semantic search in decentralized AI systems, culminating in the \textbf{Zen Reranker}---a specialized embedding model with native 7680-dimensional output. Current embedding models produce heterogeneous dimensionalities (768 to 8192), requiring costly alignment layers when combining embeddings from different models. We demonstrate that 7680 dimensions represents a Pareto-optimal choice: sufficient capacity to preserve semantic information from frontier LLMs (DeepSeek-V3: 7168-dim, Qwen3-72B: 8192-dim, Llama-3.3-70B: 8192-dim) while enabling efficient BitDelta compression (31.87$\times$). The Zen Reranker achieves 68.4 on \MTEB{} benchmarks, competitive with larger models, while providing three key advantages for decentralized systems: (1) \textbf{Zero-Alignment Overhead}---embeddings are natively compatible with the \DSO{} canonical space, eliminating 9.7ms projection latency, (2) \textbf{Optimal Compression}---the 7680-dim structure enables 964-byte storage per embedding with $<$0.5\% RMSE via BitDelta quantization, and (3) \textbf{Cross-Model Retrieval}---94.7\% Recall@5 when retrieving experiences across different model architectures. We release Zen Reranker as an open-source contribution to the \Zoo{} ecosystem.
|
|
|
|
\textbf{Keywords}: embedding models, semantic search, high-dimensional spaces, quantization, decentralized AI, reranking
|
|
\end{abstract}
|
|
|
|
\input{sections/01-introduction}
|
|
\input{sections/02-background}
|
|
\input{sections/03-dimensionality-analysis}
|
|
\input{sections/04-7680-dimension-optimality}
|
|
\input{sections/05-zen-reranker-architecture}
|
|
\input{sections/06-bitdelta-compression}
|
|
\input{sections/07-evaluation}
|
|
\input{sections/08-integration-with-zoo-network}
|
|
\input{sections/09-related-work}
|
|
\input{sections/10-conclusion}
|
|
\input{sections/99-acknowledgments}
|
|
|
|
\end{document}
|