mirror of
https://github.com/zoo-apps/papers.git
synced 2026-10-30 14:56:54 +00:00
Bylines, paper authorship, correspondence addresses and the founder blurb under each post named an individual. They name the organisation that published the work instead: the brand on posts and pages, the research byline on papers, and research@ in place of a personal address. Both are what these repositories already used elsewhere — nothing new was coined. Co-authors are untouched. Where a paper named someone else alongside, they stay named; only the one byline changed. Bibliography entries, running heads, PDF metadata and affiliations move with it, so a citation still resolves to whoever the cited paper names. Sample and fixture data uses the placeholder name these tests already use elsewhere, so no assertion changed meaning. Co-authored-by: Hanzo Dev <[email protected]>
93 lines
3.9 KiB
TeX
93 lines
3.9 KiB
TeX
\documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}
|
|
\usepackage{shared/zoocover}
|
|
|
|
% ============================================================
|
|
% Preamble
|
|
% ============================================================
|
|
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
|
|
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
|
|
\usepackage{lmodern}
|
|
% geometry loaded by zoocover
|
|
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts}
|
|
\usepackage{graphicx}
|
|
\usepackage{booktabs}
|
|
\usepackage{hyperref}
|
|
\usepackage{cleveref}
|
|
\usepackage{algorithm}
|
|
\usepackage{algorithmic}
|
|
\usepackage{enumitem}
|
|
\usepackage{xcolor}
|
|
\usepackage{tikz}
|
|
\usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,fit}
|
|
\usepackage{float}
|
|
\usepackage{subcaption}
|
|
\usepackage{multirow}
|
|
\usepackage{tabularx}
|
|
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
|
|
\usepackage{authblk}
|
|
\usepackage{abstract}
|
|
\usepackage{natbib}
|
|
\bibliographystyle{plainnat}
|
|
|
|
\hypersetup{
|
|
colorlinks=true,
|
|
linkcolor=blue!70!black,
|
|
citecolor=green!50!black,
|
|
urlcolor=blue!80!black
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
\pagestyle{fancy}
|
|
\fancyhf{}
|
|
\rhead{Zoo Labs Foundation Research}
|
|
\lhead{Zoo Data Commons}
|
|
\rfoot{Page \thepage}
|
|
|
|
% ============================================================
|
|
\title{\textbf{Zoo Data Commons: A Decentralized Repository for Open Biodiversity Datasets} \\[0.5em]
|
|
\large FAIR-Compliant Data Infrastructure with Provenance Tracking and Incentivized Curation}
|
|
|
|
\author[1]{Zoo Labs Foundation Research}
|
|
\affil[1]{Zoo Labs Foundation Research, Research Division \\ \texttt{[email protected]}}
|
|
|
|
\date{July 2023}
|
|
|
|
\begin{document}
|
|
|
|
\zoocoverpage
|
|
|
|
% ============================================================
|
|
% Abstract
|
|
% ============================================================
|
|
\begin{abstract}
|
|
\noindent
|
|
Biodiversity data is fragmented across thousands of institutional repositories, government databases, citizen science platforms, and individual researcher collections, impeding the large-scale ecological analyses essential for conservation decision-making.
|
|
We present the Zoo Data Commons (ZDC), a decentralized repository for open biodiversity datasets built on IPFS and the Zoo Network blockchain.
|
|
ZDC introduces a novel \emph{Data Object Model} that wraps biodiversity datasets in cryptographically signed metadata envelopes conforming to the FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable).
|
|
Each data object carries an immutable provenance chain recording its complete transformation history from raw collection through processing, validation, and aggregation.
|
|
We implement a three-tier access control system supporting open, permissioned, and sovereign data governance models, enabling indigenous communities and local stakeholders to maintain control over culturally sensitive ecological knowledge.
|
|
A token-incentivized curation market rewards data contributors, validators, and annotators, aligning individual incentives with collective data quality improvement.
|
|
Over 12 months of operation, ZDC has ingested 2.4 million biodiversity records across 14,200 species from 847 contributors, with a median data quality score 23\% higher than comparable centralized repositories.
|
|
The platform has facilitated 312 cross-institutional data reuse events and supported 47 peer-reviewed publications.
|
|
ZDC is specified as Zoo Improvement Proposal ZIP-009 and deployed as open infrastructure.
|
|
\end{abstract}
|
|
|
|
\vspace{0.5em}
|
|
\noindent\textbf{Keywords:} biodiversity data, FAIR principles, decentralized storage, data provenance, IPFS, access control, open science
|
|
|
|
% ============================================================
|
|
% 1. Introduction
|
|
% ============================================================
|
|
|
|
\input{sections/01-introduction}
|
|
\input{sections/02-related-work}
|
|
\input{sections/03-fair-native-data-object-model}
|
|
\input{sections/04-provenance-preserving-storage}
|
|
\input{sections/05-sovereign-access-control}
|
|
\input{sections/06-incentivized-curation-market}
|
|
\input{sections/07-implementation}
|
|
\input{sections/08-evaluation}
|
|
\input{sections/09-discussion}
|
|
\input{sections/99-conclusion}
|
|
|
|
\end{document}
|