mirror of
https://github.com/zoo-apps/papers.git
synced 2026-11-03 14:59:55 +00:00
Bylines, paper authorship, correspondence addresses and the founder blurb under each post named an individual. They name the organisation that published the work instead: the brand on posts and pages, the research byline on papers, and research@ in place of a personal address. Both are what these repositories already used elsewhere — nothing new was coined. Co-authors are untouched. Where a paper named someone else alongside, they stay named; only the one byline changed. Bibliography entries, running heads, PDF metadata and affiliations move with it, so a citation still resolves to whoever the cited paper names. Sample and fixture data uses the placeholder name these tests already use elsewhere, so no assertion changed meaning. Co-authored-by: Hanzo Dev <[email protected]>
92 lines
4.3 KiB
TeX
92 lines
4.3 KiB
TeX
\documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}
|
|
\usepackage{shared/zoocover}
|
|
|
|
% ============================================================
|
|
% Preamble
|
|
% ============================================================
|
|
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
|
|
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
|
|
\usepackage{lmodern}
|
|
% geometry loaded by zoocover
|
|
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts}
|
|
\usepackage{graphicx}
|
|
\usepackage{booktabs}
|
|
\usepackage{hyperref}
|
|
\usepackage{cleveref}
|
|
\usepackage{algorithm}
|
|
\usepackage{algorithmic}
|
|
\usepackage{enumitem}
|
|
\usepackage{xcolor}
|
|
\usepackage{tikz}
|
|
\usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,fit}
|
|
\usepackage{float}
|
|
\usepackage{subcaption}
|
|
\usepackage{multirow}
|
|
\usepackage{tabularx}
|
|
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
|
|
\usepackage{authblk}
|
|
\usepackage{abstract}
|
|
\usepackage{natbib}
|
|
\bibliographystyle{plainnat}
|
|
|
|
\hypersetup{
|
|
colorlinks=true,
|
|
linkcolor=blue!70!black,
|
|
citecolor=green!50!black,
|
|
urlcolor=blue!80!black
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
\pagestyle{fancy}
|
|
\fancyhf{}
|
|
\rhead{Antje Worring, Zoo Labs Foundation Research}
|
|
\lhead{Federated Learning for Wildlife Monitoring}
|
|
\rfoot{Page \thepage}
|
|
|
|
% ============================================================
|
|
\title{\textbf{Federated Learning for Wildlife Monitoring: Privacy-Preserving Multi-Site Analysis} \\[0.5em]
|
|
\large Cross-Institutional Data Collaboration with Differential Privacy and Heterogeneous Sensor Fusion}
|
|
|
|
\author[1]{Antje Worring, Zoo Labs Foundation Research}
|
|
\affil[1]{Antje Worring, Zoo Labs Foundation Research, Research Division \\ \texttt{[email protected]}}
|
|
|
|
\date{January 2025}
|
|
|
|
\begin{document}
|
|
|
|
\zoocoverpage
|
|
|
|
% ============================================================
|
|
% Abstract
|
|
% ============================================================
|
|
\begin{abstract}
|
|
\noindent
|
|
Wildlife monitoring generates vast quantities of sensitive data across geographically distributed sites managed by independent institutions with heterogeneous sensor deployments and conflicting data-sharing policies.
|
|
Training unified machine learning models on this fragmented landscape traditionally requires centralizing raw data---a process that is often legally prohibited, ethically problematic, and logistically impractical.
|
|
We present ZooFed, a federated learning framework purpose-built for cross-institutional wildlife monitoring that enables collaborative model training without sharing raw sensor data.
|
|
ZooFed introduces three innovations: a \emph{Heterogeneous Sensor Adapter} (HSA) that normalizes inputs from camera traps, acoustic recorders, GPS collars, eDNA samplers, and satellite imagery into a shared feature space compatible with federated aggregation; a \emph{Conservation-Calibrated Differential Privacy} (CCDP) mechanism that allocates privacy budgets based on species sensitivity rather than uniform noise injection, providing stronger protection for endangered species locations; and a \emph{Non-IID Robust Aggregation} (NIRA) algorithm that handles the extreme statistical heterogeneity of ecological data across sites with different species assemblages, climatic conditions, and sensor configurations.
|
|
We evaluate ZooFed on a consortium of 18 wildlife monitoring sites across 9 countries, encompassing 4.2 million sensor events from 847 species.
|
|
ZooFed achieves 89.4\% species detection accuracy, within 2.1 percentage points of a centralized oracle with full data access, while providing $(\epsilon, \delta)$-differential privacy guarantees with $\epsilon = 2.0$ for common species and $\epsilon = 0.5$ for critically endangered species.
|
|
Compared to local-only models, ZooFed improves detection accuracy by 18.7\% on average and by 31.2\% for rare species that benefit most from cross-site knowledge transfer.
|
|
\end{abstract}
|
|
|
|
\vspace{0.5em}
|
|
\noindent\textbf{Keywords:} federated learning, wildlife monitoring, differential privacy, sensor fusion, cross-institutional collaboration, conservation AI
|
|
|
|
% ============================================================
|
|
% 1. Introduction
|
|
% ============================================================
|
|
|
|
\input{sections/01-introduction}
|
|
\input{sections/02-related-work}
|
|
\input{sections/03-problem-formulation}
|
|
\input{sections/04-heterogeneous-sensor-adapter}
|
|
\input{sections/05-conservation-calibrated-differential-pri}
|
|
\input{sections/06-non-iid-robust-aggregation}
|
|
\input{sections/07-implementation}
|
|
\input{sections/08-evaluation}
|
|
\input{sections/09-case-studies}
|
|
\input{sections/10-discussion}
|
|
\input{sections/99-conclusion}
|
|
|
|
\end{document}
|