mirror of
https://github.com/zoo-apps/papers.git
synced 2026-11-02 17:38:34 +00:00
53 lines
2.7 KiB
TeX
53 lines
2.7 KiB
TeX
\section{Why AI + Blockchain}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\subsection{AI's Limitations Without Blockchain}
|
|
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
\item \textbf{Centralized Control}: Models trained by corporations serve corporate interests—data extraction, engagement maximization, profit optimization.
|
|
\item \textbf{Opacity}: Weight updates are uninterpretable—no one knows \textit{why} model behavior changes.
|
|
\item \textbf{Fragility}: Models degrade unpredictably, catastrophic forgetting erases learned behaviors.
|
|
\item \textbf{Inaccessibility}: Training costs and infrastructure requirements exclude 99\% of researchers.
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
\subsection{Blockchain's Limitations Without AI}
|
|
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
\item \textbf{Speculative Focus}: Blockchain dominated by cryptocurrency speculation, not societal utility.
|
|
\item \textbf{Complexity}: Smart contract development requires specialized expertise, limiting adoption.
|
|
\item \textbf{Storage Costs}: On-chain storage expensive—genomic data requires off-chain solutions (IPFS/Arweave).
|
|
\item \textbf{User Experience}: Wallets, gas fees, and transaction confirmation confuse non-technical users.
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
\subsection{Combined Benefits}
|
|
|
|
\begin{table*}[t]
|
|
\centering
|
|
\caption{AI + Blockchain Synergies}
|
|
\label{tab:synergies}
|
|
\begin{tabular}{@{}p{0.25\linewidth}p{0.35\linewidth}p{0.35\linewidth}@{}}
|
|
\toprule
|
|
\textbf{Challenge} & \textbf{AI Contribution} & \textbf{Blockchain Contribution} \\ \midrule
|
|
\textbf{Conservation Data} & Analyze genomes, predict extinction risk & Immutable storage, provenance tracking \\
|
|
\textbf{Model Training} & Fine-tune specialized models & Decentralized compute marketplace \\
|
|
\textbf{Governance} & NLP-based proposal analysis & Transparent voting, tamper-proof records \\
|
|
\textbf{Attribution} & Code/genome authorship detection & Cryptographic proof of contribution \\
|
|
\textbf{Reproducibility} & Model checkpoints & Content-addressed versioning \\
|
|
\textbf{Incentives} & Quality assessment (reward models) & Token-based contributor rewards \\
|
|
\bottomrule
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
|
\end{table*}
|
|
|
|
\textbf{Concrete Example: Coral Genome Project} \\
|
|
AI analyzes 14TB metagenomic data, predicting 420,000 gene functions. Blockchain records:
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item Raw sequencing data → IPFS CID \texttt{Qm...}
|
|
\item Analysis pipeline → Git commit hash + Docker image
|
|
\item Gene annotations → Smart contract with Merkle tree
|
|
\item Contributor identities → Ethereum addresses
|
|
\item Governance votes → On-chain transaction history
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
Result: Complete scientific reproducibility, permanent accessibility (even if Zoo Labs Foundation dissolves), contributor attribution for funding/recognition, and democratic control over data usage policies.
|
|
|