mirror of
https://github.com/zoo-apps/papers.git
synced 2026-10-30 14:56:54 +00:00
Bylines, paper authorship, correspondence addresses and the founder blurb under each post named an individual. They name the organisation that published the work instead: the brand on posts and pages, the research byline on papers, and research@ in place of a personal address. Both are what these repositories already used elsewhere — nothing new was coined. Co-authors are untouched. Where a paper named someone else alongside, they stay named; only the one byline changed. Bibliography entries, running heads, PDF metadata and affiliations move with it, so a citation still resolves to whoever the cited paper names. Sample and fixture data uses the placeholder name these tests already use elsewhere, so no assertion changed meaning. Co-authored-by: Hanzo Dev <[email protected]>
90 lines
4.1 KiB
TeX
90 lines
4.1 KiB
TeX
\documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}
|
|
\usepackage{shared/zoocover}
|
|
|
|
% ============================================================
|
|
% Preamble
|
|
% ============================================================
|
|
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
|
|
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
|
|
\usepackage{lmodern}
|
|
% geometry loaded by zoocover
|
|
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts}
|
|
\usepackage{graphicx}
|
|
\usepackage{booktabs}
|
|
\usepackage{hyperref}
|
|
\usepackage{cleveref}
|
|
\usepackage{algorithm}
|
|
\usepackage{algorithmic}
|
|
\usepackage{enumitem}
|
|
\usepackage{xcolor}
|
|
\usepackage{tikz}
|
|
\usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,fit}
|
|
\usepackage{float}
|
|
\usepackage{subcaption}
|
|
\usepackage{multirow}
|
|
\usepackage{tabularx}
|
|
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
|
|
\usepackage{authblk}
|
|
\usepackage{abstract}
|
|
\usepackage{natbib}
|
|
\bibliographystyle{plainnat}
|
|
|
|
\hypersetup{
|
|
colorlinks=true,
|
|
linkcolor=blue!70!black,
|
|
citecolor=green!50!black,
|
|
urlcolor=blue!80!black
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
\pagestyle{fancy}
|
|
\fancyhf{}
|
|
\rhead{Antje Worring, Zoo Labs Foundation Research}
|
|
\lhead{Mobile Inference for Field Conservation}
|
|
\rfoot{Page \thepage}
|
|
|
|
% ============================================================
|
|
\title{\textbf{Mobile Inference for Field Conservation: On-Device Species Recognition} \\[0.5em]
|
|
\large Model Compression, Quantization, and Offline-First Deployment for Edge Biodiversity Monitoring}
|
|
|
|
\author[1]{Antje Worring, Zoo Labs Foundation Research}
|
|
\affil[1]{Antje Worring, Zoo Labs Foundation Research, Research Division \\ \texttt{[email protected]}}
|
|
|
|
\date{December 2024}
|
|
|
|
\begin{document}
|
|
|
|
\zoocoverpage
|
|
|
|
% ============================================================
|
|
% Abstract
|
|
% ============================================================
|
|
\begin{abstract}
|
|
\noindent
|
|
Automated species recognition has achieved remarkable accuracy in laboratory settings, but deploying these models to the field---where connectivity is absent, hardware is constrained, and real-time identification drives conservation decisions---remains an open challenge.
|
|
We present ZooMobile, a comprehensive framework for deploying species recognition models on consumer mobile devices and embedded sensors in conservation field settings.
|
|
ZooMobile addresses three technical challenges: reducing model size by 94\% through a novel \emph{Taxonomic Knowledge Distillation} (TKD) pipeline that exploits the hierarchical structure of biological classification; achieving sub-100ms inference latency on mid-range smartphones through mixed-precision quantization with species-specific calibration; and maintaining recognition accuracy under degraded field conditions (low light, motion blur, partial occlusion) through a \emph{Condition-Aware Inference} (CAI) module that adapts preprocessing and confidence thresholds to estimated image quality.
|
|
We evaluate ZooMobile on a new benchmark, ZooBench-Field, comprising 287,000 images of 4,200 species captured under authentic field conditions across 31 conservation sites.
|
|
On this benchmark, ZooMobile achieves 87.3\% top-1 accuracy and 96.1\% top-5 accuracy with a 12 MB model running at 47ms per inference on a Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 processor, compared to 91.8\% top-1 accuracy for a 203 MB cloud-based baseline.
|
|
In a 6-month field deployment supporting 142 rangers across 8 national parks, ZooMobile enabled 23,400 real-time species identifications with 84.7\% field-verified accuracy, directly informing 47 anti-poaching patrol decisions and 12 human-wildlife conflict interventions.
|
|
\end{abstract}
|
|
|
|
\vspace{0.5em}
|
|
\noindent\textbf{Keywords:} species recognition, model compression, quantization, edge inference, mobile deployment, conservation technology
|
|
|
|
% ============================================================
|
|
% 1. Introduction
|
|
% ============================================================
|
|
|
|
\input{sections/01-introduction}
|
|
\input{sections/02-related-work}
|
|
\input{sections/03-taxonomic-knowledge-distillation}
|
|
\input{sections/04-species-specific-mixed-precision-quantiz}
|
|
\input{sections/05-condition-aware-inference}
|
|
\input{sections/06-zoobench-field-benchmark}
|
|
\input{sections/07-offline-first-architecture}
|
|
\input{sections/08-field-deployment}
|
|
\input{sections/09-discussion}
|
|
\input{sections/99-conclusion}
|
|
|
|
\end{document}
|