Adds a 1-per-turn todo-list item and item.updated event
```jsonl
{"type":"item.started","item":{"id":"item_6","item_type":"todo_list","items":[{"text":"Record initial two-step plan now","completed":false},{"text":"Update progress to next step","completed":false}]}}
{"type":"item.updated","item":{"id":"item_6","item_type":"todo_list","items":[{"text":"Record initial two-step plan now","completed":true},{"text":"Update progress to next step","completed":false}]}}
{"type":"item.completed","item":{"id":"item_6","item_type":"todo_list","items":[{"text":"Record initial two-step plan now","completed":true},{"text":"Update progress to next step","completed":false}]}}
```
Adds a new `item.started` event to `codex exec` and implements it for
command_execution item type.
```jsonl
{"type":"session.created","session_id":"019982d1-75f0-7920-b051-e0d3731a5ed8"}
{"type":"item.completed","item":{"id":"item_0","item_type":"reasoning","text":"**Executing commands securely**\n\nI'm thinking about how the default harness typically uses \"bash -lc,\" while historically \"bash\" is what we've been using. The command should be executed as a string in our CLI, so using \"bash -lc 'echo hello'\" is optimal but calling \"echo hello\" directly feels safer. The sandbox makes sure environment variables like CODEX_SANDBOX_NETWORK_DISABLED=1 are set, so I won't ask for approval. I just need to run \"echo hello\" and correctly present the output."}}
{"type":"item.completed","item":{"id":"item_1","item_type":"reasoning","text":"**Preparing for tool calls**\n\nI realize that I need to include a preamble before making any tool calls. So, I'll first state the preamble in the commentary channel, then proceed with the tool call. After that, I need to present the final message along with the output. It's possible that the CLI will show the output inline, but I must ensure that I present the result clearly regardless. Let's move forward and get this organized!"}}
{"type":"item.completed","item":{"id":"item_2","item_type":"assistant_message","text":"Running `echo` to confirm shell access and print output."}}
{"type":"item.started","item":{"id":"item_3","item_type":"command_execution","command":"bash -lc echo hello","aggregated_output":"","exit_code":null,"status":"in_progress"}}
{"type":"item.completed","item":{"id":"item_3","item_type":"command_execution","command":"bash -lc echo hello","aggregated_output":"hello\n","exit_code":0,"status":"completed"}}
{"type":"item.completed","item":{"id":"item_4","item_type":"assistant_message","text":"hello"}}
```
This changes the reqwest client used in tests to be sandbox-friendly,
and skips a bunch of other tests that don't work inside the
sandbox/without network.
This pull request add a new experimental format of JSON output.
You can try it using `codex exec --experimental-json`.
Design takes a lot of inspiration from Responses API items and stream
format.
# Session and items
Each invocation of `codex exec` starts or resumes a session.
Session contains multiple high-level item types:
1. Assistant message
2. Assistant thinking
3. Command execution
4. File changes
5. To-do lists
6. etc.
# Events
Session and items are going through their life cycles which is
represented by events.
Session is `session.created` or `session.resumed`
Items are `item.added`, `item.updated`, `item.completed`,
`item.require_approval` (or other item types like `item.output_delta`
when we need streaming).
So a typical session can look like:
<details>
```
{
"type": "session.created",
"session_id": "01997dac-9581-7de3-b6a0-1df8256f2752"
}
{
"type": "item.completed",
"item": {
"id": "itm_0",
"item_type": "assistant_message",
"text": "I’ll locate the top-level README and remove its first line. Then I’ll show a quick summary of what changed."
}
}
{
"type": "item.completed",
"item": {
"id": "itm_1",
"item_type": "command_execution",
"command": "bash -lc ls -la | sed -n '1,200p'",
"aggregated_output": "pyenv: cannot rehash: /Users/pakrym/.pyenv/shims isn't writable\ntotal 192\ndrwxr-xr-x@ 33 pakrym staff 1056 Sep 24 14:36 .\ndrwxr-xr-x 41 pakrym staff 1312 Sep 24 09:17 ..\n-rw-r--r--@ 1 pakrym staff 6 Jul 9 16:16 .codespellignore\n-rw-r--r--@ 1 pakrym staff 258 Aug 13 09:40 .codespellrc\ndrwxr-xr-x@ 5 pakrym staff 160 Jul 23 08:26 .devcontainer\n-rw-r--r--@ 1 pakrym staff 6148 Jul 22 10:03 .DS_Store\ndrwxr-xr-x@ 15 pakrym staff 480 Sep 24 14:38 .git\ndrwxr-xr-x@ 12 pakrym staff 384 Sep 2 16:00 .github\n-rw-r--r--@ 1 pakrym staff 778 Jul 9 16:16 .gitignore\ndrwxr-xr-x@ 3 pakrym staff 96 Aug 11 09:37 .husky\n-rw-r--r--@ 1 pakrym staff 104 Jul 9 16:16 .npmrc\n-rw-r--r--@ 1 pakrym staff 96 Sep 2 08:52 .prettierignore\n-rw-r--r--@ 1 pakrym staff 170 Jul 9 16:16 .prettierrc.toml\ndrwxr-xr-x@ 5 pakrym staff 160 Sep 14 17:43 .vscode\ndrwxr-xr-x@ 2 pakrym staff 64 Sep 11 11:37 2025-09-11\n-rw-r--r--@ 1 pakrym staff 5505 Sep 18 09:28 AGENTS.md\n-rw-r--r--@ 1 pakrym staff 92 Sep 2 08:52 CHANGELOG.md\n-rw-r--r--@ 1 pakrym staff 1145 Jul 9 16:16 cliff.toml\ndrwxr-xr-x@ 11 pakrym staff 352 Sep 24 13:03 codex-cli\ndrwxr-xr-x@ 38 pakrym staff 1216 Sep 24 14:38 codex-rs\ndrwxr-xr-x@ 18 pakrym staff 576 Sep 23 11:01 docs\n-rw-r--r--@ 1 pakrym staff 2038 Jul 9 16:16 flake.lock\n-rw-r--r--@ 1 pakrym staff 1434 Jul 9 16:16 flake.nix\n-rw-r--r--@ 1 pakrym staff 10926 Jul 9 16:16 LICENSE\ndrwxr-xr-x@ 465 pakrym staff 14880 Jul 15 07:36 node_modules\n-rw-r--r--@ 1 pakrym staff 242 Aug 5 08:25 NOTICE\n-rw-r--r--@ 1 pakrym staff 578 Aug 14 12:31 package.json\n-rw-r--r--@ 1 pakrym staff 498 Aug 11 09:37 pnpm-lock.yaml\n-rw-r--r--@ 1 pakrym staff 58 Aug 11 09:37 pnpm-workspace.yaml\n-rw-r--r--@ 1 pakrym staff 2402 Jul 9 16:16 PNPM.md\n-rw-r--r--@ 1 pakrym staff 4393 Sep 12 14:36 README.md\ndrwxr-xr-x@ 4 pakrym staff 128 Sep 18 09:28 scripts\ndrwxr-xr-x@ 2 pakrym staff 64 Sep 11 11:34 tmp\n",
"exit_code": 0,
"status": "completed"
}
}
{
"type": "item.completed",
"item": {
"id": "itm_2",
"item_type": "reasoning",
"text": "**Reviewing README.md file**\n\nI've located the README.md file at the root, and it’s 4393 bytes. Now, I need to remove the first line, but first, I should check its content to make sure I’m patching it correctly. I’ll use sed to display the first 20 lines. By reviewing those lines, I can determine exactly what needs to be removed before I proceed with the editing. Let's do this carefully!"
}
}
{
"type": "item.completed",
"item": {
"id": "itm_3",
"item_type": "command_execution",
"command": "bash -lc sed -n '1,40p' README.md",
"aggregated_output": "<h1 align=\"center\">OpenAI Codex CLI</h1>\n\n<p align=\"center\"><code>npm i -g @openai/codex</code><br />or <code>brew install codex</code></p>\n\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Codex CLI</strong> is a coding agent from OpenAI that runs locally on your computer.\n</br>\n</br>If you want Codex in your code editor (VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf), <a href=\"https://developers.openai.com/codex/ide\">install in your IDE</a>\n</br>If you are looking for the <em>cloud-based agent</em> from OpenAI, <strong>Codex Web</strong>, go to <a href=\"https://chatgpt.com/codex\">chatgpt.com/codex</a></p>\n\n<p align=\"center\">\n <img src=\"./.github/codex-cli-splash.png\" alt=\"Codex CLI splash\" width=\"80%\" />\n </p>\n\n---\n\n## Quickstart\n\n### Installing and running Codex CLI\n\nInstall globally with your preferred package manager. If you use npm:\n\n```shell\nnpm install -g @openai/codex\n```\n\nAlternatively, if you use Homebrew:\n\n```shell\nbrew install codex\n```\n\nThen simply run `codex` to get started:\n\n```shell\ncodex\n```\n\n<details>\n<summary>You can also go to the <a href=\"https://github.com/openai/codex/releases/latest\">latest GitHub Release</a> and download the appropriate binary for your platform.</summary>\n\n",
"exit_code": 0,
"status": "completed"
}
}
{
"type": "item.completed",
"item": {
"id": "itm_4",
"item_type": "reasoning",
"text": "**Updating README file**\n\nThe user wants to update the README by removing the first line, which is an HTML h1 tag. I'll proceed to delete that line while keeping the rest intact. To do this, I need to use the apply_patch tool and create a patch in the diff format. I’ll take care to include context lines around the change. After removing the header, I’m considering whether to delete the following blank line as well to keep it tidy."
}
}
{
"type": "item.completed",
"item": {
"id": "itm_5",
"item_type": "reasoning",
"text": "**Crafting the patch**\n\nThe user has asked to remove just the first line, without mentioning the blank lines. Technically, leaving a blank line at the start is acceptable, but it's not ideal. Ideally, I'd prefer to remove the first line while maintaining the subsequent blank line. However, if I can also remove that blank line, it could tidy things up even more. Still, since the user's request is strictly to remove only the first line, I'll stick to that and craft the patch accordingly."
}
}
{
"type": "item.completed",
"item": {
"id": "itm_6",
"item_type": "assistant_message",
"text": "Applying the change by removing the first line from `README.md`."
}
}
{
"type": "item.completed",
"item": {
"id": "itm_7",
"item_type": "file_change",
"changes": [
{
"path": "/Users/pakrym/code/codex/README.md",
"kind": "update"
}
],
"status": "completed"
}
}
{
"type": "item.completed",
"item": {
"id": "itm_8",
"item_type": "reasoning",
"text": "**Validating README Update**\n\nI updated the README.md and now I need to validate that the first line has been successfully removed. To do this, I'll check the first 10 lines of the document to ensure everything looks correct. It’s always good to double-check these kinds of changes, so I’m going to take that extra step to make sure the update was executed properly. Let's see what those initial lines say!"
}
}
{
"type": "item.completed",
"item": {
"id": "itm_9",
"item_type": "command_execution",
"command": "bash -lc sed -n '1,20p' README.md",
"aggregated_output": "\n<p align=\"center\"><code>npm i -g @openai/codex</code><br />or <code>brew install codex</code></p>\n\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Codex CLI</strong> is a coding agent from OpenAI that runs locally on your computer.\n</br>\n</br>If you want Codex in your code editor (VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf), <a href=\"https://developers.openai.com/codex/ide\">install in your IDE</a>\n</br>If you are looking for the <em>cloud-based agent</em> from OpenAI, <strong>Codex Web</strong>, go to <a href=\"https://chatgpt.com/codex\">chatgpt.com/codex</a></p>\n\n<p align=\"center\">\n <img src=\"./.github/codex-cli-splash.png\" alt=\"Codex CLI splash\" width=\"80%\" />\n </p>\n\n---\n\n## Quickstart\n\n### Installing and running Codex CLI\n\nInstall globally with your preferred package manager. If you use npm:\n\n",
"exit_code": 0,
"status": "completed"
}
}
{
"type": "item.completed",
"item": {
"id": "itm_10",
"item_type": "assistant_message",
"text": "- Updated `README.md:1` by removing the opening H1 line.\n- The README now starts with the install instructions paragraph.\n\nWant me to also remove the leading blank line at the top?"
}
}
```
</details>
The idea is to give users fully formatted items they can use directly in
their rendering/application logic and avoid having them building up
items manually based on events (unless they want to for streaming).
This PR implements only the `item.completed` payload for some event
types, more event types and item types to come.
---------
Co-authored-by: Hanzo Dev <[email protected]>
### Summary
Sometimes in exec runs, we want to allow the model to use the
`update_plan` tool, but that's not easily configurable. This change adds
a feature flag for this, and formats the output so it's human-readable
## Test Plan
<img width="1280" height="354" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-11 at 12 39
44 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/72e11070-fb98-47f5-a784-5123ca7333d9"
/>
- Adopt upstream changes in exec, mcp-server, and common by bucket.
- Preserve fork-specific core (codex.rs, browser/agent tools, UA/version).
- Add Prompt.output_schema; keep our Text controls; adjust tests.
- Fallback to Op::UserInput for UserTurn in exec and MCP.
- Keep ours for core codex files to preserve TUI/stream ordering.
verify.sh: pass; build-fast.sh: pass (no warnings).
- Preserve TUI and core tool wiring (browser_/agent_/web_fetch, strict ordering)
- Adopt upstream in common/exec/file-search and minor fixes
- Resolve conflicts per policy; revert core files to ours to restore API compat
- verify.sh and build-fast.sh pass (no warnings)
- Prefer ours for TUI and core API invariants; adopted upstream for exec/common where safe
- Restored fork invariants (browser/agent tools, UA/version) and added missing deps
- Aligned conversation manager to session_id flow; added resume wiring via config
- Re-exported rollout helpers at crate root for exec; fixed MCP/TUI call sites
- Build passes verify.sh and ./build-fast.sh with zero errors
Adding the ability to resume conversations.
we have one verb `resume`.
Behavior:
`tui`:
`codex resume`: opens session picker
`codex resume --last`: continue last message
`codex resume <session id>`: continue conversation with `session id`
`exec`:
`codex resume --last`: continue last conversation
`codex resume <session id>`: continue conversation with `session id`
Implementation:
- I added a function to find the path in `~/.codex/sessions/` with a
`UUID`. This is helpful in resuming with session id.
- Added the above mentioned flags
- Added lots of testing
## 📝 Review Mode -- Core
This PR introduces the Core implementation for Review mode:
- New op `Op::Review { prompt: String }:` spawns a child review task
with isolated context, a review‑specific system prompt, and a
`Config.review_model`.
- `EnteredReviewMode`: emitted when the child review session starts.
Every event from this point onwards reflects the review session.
- `ExitedReviewMode(Option<ReviewOutputEvent>)`: emitted when the review
finishes or is interrupted, with optional structured findings:
```json
{
"findings": [
{
"title": "<≤ 80 chars, imperative>",
"body": "<valid Markdown explaining *why* this is a problem; cite files/lines/functions>",
"confidence_score": <float 0.0-1.0>,
"priority": <int 0-3>,
"code_location": {
"absolute_file_path": "<file path>",
"line_range": {"start": <int>, "end": <int>}
}
}
],
"overall_correctness": "patch is correct" | "patch is incorrect",
"overall_explanation": "<1-3 sentence explanation justifying the overall_correctness verdict>",
"overall_confidence_score": <float 0.0-1.0>
}
```
## Questions
### Why separate out its own message history?
We want the review thread to match the training of our review models as
much as possible -- that means using a custom prompt, removing user
instructions, and starting a clean chat history.
We also want to make sure the review thread doesn't leak into the parent
thread.
### Why do this as a mode, vs. sub-agents?
1. We want review to be a synchronous task, so it's fine for now to do a
bespoke implementation.
2. We're still unclear about the final structure for sub-agents. We'd
prefer to land this quickly and then refactor into sub-agents without
rushing that implementation.
`ClientRequest::NewConversation` picks up the reasoning level from the user's defaults in `config.toml`, so it should be reported in `NewConversationResponse`.
Created this PR by:
- adding `redundant_clone` to `[workspace.lints.clippy]` in
`cargo-rs/Cargol.toml`
- running `cargo clippy --tests --fix`
- running `just fmt`
Though I had to clean up one instance of the following that resulted:
```rust
let codex = codex;
```
This PR does the following:
* Adds the ability to paste or type an API key.
* Removes the `preferred_auth_method` config option. The last login
method is always persisted in auth.json, so this isn't needed.
* If OPENAI_API_KEY env variable is defined, the value is used to
prepopulate the new UI. The env variable is otherwise ignored by the
CLI.
* Adds a new MCP server entry point "login_api_key" so we can implement
this same API key behavior for the VS Code extension.
<img width="473" height="140" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-04 at 3 51 04 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c11bbd5b-8a4d-4d71-90fd-34130460f9d9"
/>
<img width="726" height="254" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-04 at 3 51 32 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6cc76b34-309a-4387-acbc-15ee5c756db9"
/>
This PR changes get history op to get path. Then, forking will use a
path. This will help us have one unified codepath for resuming/forking
conversations. Will also help in having rollout history in order. It
also fixes a bug where you won't see the UI when resuming after forking.
James Peter