mirror of
https://github.com/hanzoai/id.git
synced 2026-10-16 18:38:15 +00:00
zooqueenandHanzo Dev
bc3e47cb22
Reported from a phone: fill in email + password on hanzo.id/signup, press
Create account, get "the application does not allow to sign up new account".
Not reproducible on demand, which is the tell.
resolveOrg spreads the runtime catalog OVER the built-in table, and for
hanzo.id the two named DIFFERENT applications:
built-in DEFAULT_TENANTS hanzo-id enableSignUp false
catalog /config.json hanzo-console enableSignUp true
So the answer to "can this person create an account" depended on whether a
second network fetch arrived before the form was submitted. When it did, signup
worked -- which is why it looks fine from a desk. When it did not, the page
still rendered a full form (the fallback app permits password login, just not
registration) and IAM refused the POST. On a phone a dropped request is
ordinary, so that is where it showed up.
Confirmed against prod by replaying the exact POST the SPA makes:
clientId=hanzo-console application=hanzo-console -> past the gate
clientId=hanzo-console application=hanzo-id -> "the application does
not allow to sign up
new account"
The second line is the customer's screenshot, reproduced.
lux.id had the same divergence (lux-id vs lux-cloud); both are false there, so
it was latent rather than live. Fixed with hanzo's -- the invariant is one host
one app, not "the currently harmful ones".
The fix is NOT to make the fallback survivable. This table is a fallback for a
failed /config.json, not a second opinion, so the answer is that there is only
one answer per host. org.test.ts now asserts that resolving a host WITH and
WITHOUT the catalog yields the same clientId; reverting org.ts reproduces the
failure ("hanzo.id fallback", 1 failed | 15 passed) and restoring it passes,
so the guard is known to bite. 171/171, typecheck clean.
Co-authored-by: Hanzo Dev <[email protected]>
@hanzo/id
White-label login + identity verification portal. One Vite SPA, four hosts
(hanzo.id, lux.id, zoo.id, pars.id), per-tenant brand resolved from
the request hostname at runtime.
Layout
apps/
web/ Vite + React 19 + @hanzo/gui — the actual SPA
k8s/ Deployment + Service + Ingress (4 hosts, 4 TLS secrets)
pkgs/
shared/ @hanzo/id-shared — TenantConfig + brand resolver
auth/ @hanzo/id-auth — composable login/signup/OTP flows
on top of @hanzo/iam SDK
idv/ @hanzo/id-idv — pluggable identity verification
(Persona, Onfido, Veriff, stub)
legacy-nextjs/ Frozen — predecessor Next.js implementation. Kept
for reference until v0.1.0 ships to production.
Local dev
pnpm install
pnpm dev # http://localhost:5173 (defaults to hanzo brand)
To preview a different brand locally, edit /etc/hosts:
127.0.0.1 lux.id zoo.id pars.id
then visit http://lux.id:5173.
Build
pnpm build # builds apps/web -> dist/
docker build -t ghcr.io/hanzoai/id:0.1.0 .
Adding a brand
- Publish or workspace-link the new per-org brand pkg (must ship
brand.jsonat the package root and match theBrandContractshape inpkgs/shared/src/types.ts). - Add a
DEFAULT_TENANTSentry inpkgs/shared/src/tenant.tsOR put the override in the runtime catalog (IAM_TENANT_CONFIG_JSONenv) so no rebuild is needed. - Add the hostname to
apps/web/vite.config.ts::BRAND_PACKAGES(lets dev + build serve/brand/<pkg>/brand.json). - Add the hostname + TLS secret to
apps/web/k8s/ingress.yaml. - DNS: CNAME or A record → cluster ingress IP.
That's it — no per-brand Worker, no per-brand image, no per-brand deployment. One binary, four brands.
Plugging an IDV provider
import { registerProvider, createPersonaProvider } from '@hanzo/id-idv'
registerProvider(createPersonaProvider({
templateId: import.meta.env.VITE_PERSONA_TEMPLATE_ID,
apiKey: import.meta.env.VITE_PERSONA_API_KEY,
environment: 'production',
}))
The portal stays unchanged — switching providers is a single registration call at boot.