This adds precaching to ReactDOMFiber. I.e. adding a handle from the DOM
node to the internal Fiber. This means that we need to expose an internal
handle to the reconciler.
We use duck typing to figure out if it is a Fiber or Stack instance.
The new failing tests are failing because this is now able to actually
fire events onto Fibers and then the result of those events are
incorrect where as they were ignored before.
* Reapply Check for event listener in props instead of bank (#8192)
This reverts the previous revert.
* Don't throw on falsy event listeners
Some code relies on passing null. This restores the earlier behavior.
This matches Stack behavior.
Had to rewrite a test that used Simulate because Fiber doesn't support events yet.
Also changed tests for componentDidUpdate() since Fiber intentionally doesn't pass prevContext argument.
We can avoid recreating the merged context object if the context provider work was reused. This is essential to avoid allocations for deep setState() calls.
As per discussion, this is better because then this code only runs for the class type of work. We will still need to fix bailouts for deep setState calls.
It is error-prone to push and pop context in begin or complete phases because of all the bailouts. Scheduler has enough knowledge to see if pushing is necessary because it knows when we go inside or outside the tree.
I'll plan to change all of our console.error and component-tree expects to expectDev. It's a little annoying that we need to make sure tests don't throw (see my change to normalizeCodeLocInfo) but any alternative would seem to require two separate test runs or a much more cumbersome syntax.
* Handles risky callbacks on setState. Fixes#8238
* Updates try-catch to cover `callback` when context is not present.
* Updates code to trapErrors instead of swallowing them.
* Fixes flow errors
* Incorporates review comments
* Traps only the first error.
Removes `callbackWasCalled` and updates fiber tests.
I came up with a contrived case of where nested controlled events could
fire within the same batch - but on different targets.
I think we came to the conclusion that controlled values typically cannot
use preventDefault so it is ok that they don't flush until after the event
has finished. So therefore we accumulate a queue of all the nested targets
within a batch and then restore state on all of them.
I'm still skeptical that this is the correct way to do controlled values.
The reason we have to do them in a single event loop is because when you
type, the sequence of values that get accepted or not can matter. I wonder
if there is a scenario we can come up with where you can fire multiple
inner events in an event loop and end up with batching causing problems.
This effectively just reimplements asap again but with no allocations for
a single target and no closure allocations.
* Make the Shallow Rendering example clearer
I was reading through the documentation, and I found that the `render` call on the `renderer` was missing.
* Use a regular function to define MyComponent
* Use _hostContainerInfo to track test renderer options
The transaction is not available when unmounting or updating the
instance, so we track it using _hostContainerInfo
* Throw if hostContainerInfo is not populated in getPublicInstance
* Linting fixes
* Remove transaction from ref lifecycle code path
We don't need to pass the transaction around anymore since we store the
test options on _hostContainerInfo instead
* Remove unused argument
Sebastian Markbage